User:Busceda

Isnt it strange that anyone can be an "author" through wikipedia simply by copying the material of others? Remember that all info going into "articles" must be cited (lest some snob or psuedo-intellectual remove whatever material they choose for whatever capricious reason they come up with). This allows for no creativity or original information based on personal experience. It seems that as long as information is "cited" it doesnt matter if the info is accurate or not. Remember that if you painstakingly create or add to an article and some egghead blows it off you can employ creative vandalism. Being that most "wikipedians" cant stand criticism you might get "banned", as if it matters. Here are some things you should avoid: -Never claim to be a smoker, as all intellectuals know that breathing second hand smoke immediately causes cancer. -If someone announces on his userpage that he is "bisexual", "transgender" or "gender-confused" dont be critical, Homosexuality is accepted and therefore promoted among intellectuals. Good luck with your editing and be advised that most of these psuedo authors are insecure cowards who will do anything to put you in your place...regards, Busceda.