User:Hahnchen/Archive9

games TM
According to WP:VG/M it says you have issue 54 (02/2007) of Games TM. I was wondering if I could get a copy of the feature on Super Columbine Massacre RPG? Thanks, -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 19:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Drop me an email at Special:EmailUser/Hahnchen, and I'll reply with some scans. Super Columbine Massacre RPG! is pretty recent so there's already a plethora of information online, but you might get some decent quotes. - hahnch e n 20:12, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if you know...
...but you were mentioned over at ZDNet. &mdash; neuro(talk) 00:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Project Sylpheed.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Project Sylpheed.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:53, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I would be interested in a scan
Re: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games

i would be very interested in a scan of this article.

Here is my response to what you wrote:
 * The Edge magazine is not alone in its harsh criticism of Wikipedia deletion and notability policies, in fact journalists universally condemn these policies. Wikipedia_talk:Notability/RFC:Reevaluation I have yet to have an editor quote a positive article about these policies, despite quoting these journalists repeatedly on some of the most popular policy talk pages.
 * Hahnchen, these WikiProjects are often used as gathering places for editors whose majority "contributions" to Wikipedia is to delete other editors contributions. In otherwords, these editors behavior is the very problem journalists are describing. The only reaction you will get here are dismissive responses to your comments, as per above. For a more positive response, I suggest posting your comments on WP:Article Rescue Squadron.
 * Testing the complaints of another journalist about how Wikipedia is "ruled by bands of vigilantes who delete all new material without mercy or insight", PC Pro editor Pountain created a The Political Quarterly stub. The Political Quarterly is a distingushed journal. The stub was speedy deleted from Wikipedia within an hour. Pountain also reviewed the web 2.0 most popular webpages. After describing how tolerant Flickr, Digg and Facebook are, Pountain wrote that wikipedia is the "dark side running out of control [of Web 2.0]" and that "...It seems Wikipedia has completed the journey by arriving at an online equivalent of the midnight door-knock and the book bonfire..."
 * Hahnchen, Thank you for another article which shows yet again the "bullying" and counter- productive behavoir of many of these editors who post here.

Ikip (talk) 16:56, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * You are right, the section on wikipedia was not very critical, and was rather boring in my opinion. Here is the text: http://editthis.info/wiki/Edge_magazine I don't really car for many of the editors on WP:VG, so I post the link here instead. Thanks for the pic of the article.  Ikip (talk) 03:17, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Project H.A.M.M.E.R.
The AfD focused on the fact that it was unreleased, not that it was "a notable cancelled game". Why should this article, which consists of a lead and nothing else, BE an article? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * What sort of question is "why should this BE an article"? Because as the AFD concluded, there are significant secondary sources to support it as an article.  It has to sources to stand alone, nothing else is needed.  Copy pasting the article into Nintendo Software Technology just pointlessly weighs down the parent article, as if cancelled projects should be covered there, yet released projects should not.  When having Project H.A.M.M.E.R. where it is was perfectly acceptable anyway. - hahnch e n 20:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It can never expand barring unforeseeable circumstances. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 01:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * That doesn't make having a tangential article copy pasted into NST a good thing. It's strong enough to stand alone, and you could probably expand upon the preview gameplay, but that's beside the point. - hahnch e n 12:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Dynamic difficulty
Hi there, Hahnchen. I saw your post on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 54 and thought you could be interested on the merge that has been performed. Sorry for not warning you before, I didn't think of following the "what links here" links until after the merge was performed. Anyway, see Talk:Dynamic game difficulty balancing for more details, and to leave your opinion. Cheers, Waldir talk 19:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Magazine request
Hey, I noticed you had gamesTM issue 36 (October 2005). I was wondering if I could get the info on Robotron: 2084. (Guyinblack25 talk 21:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC))
 * Drop me an email and I'll send you the article. I won't have access to that issue until next week though. - hahnch e n 22:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Email sent. Thank you very much. (Guyinblack25 talk 17:49, 19 March 2009 (UTC))

Incite
Hi! Planescape: Torment is currently a featured article candidate, and it was mentioned that the review from incite could be used. I haven't used this magazine VG thing before so I don't know quite how it works, but if you could help us access the review in the incite issue for March 2000, it would be much appreciated. Thanks! –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 13:23, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Drop me an email and I'll send you the scan. - hahnch e n 23:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ Thanks. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 00:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:GTA - Box Front.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:GTA - Box Front.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

SUL on zh-wp
Hello, the user name Hahnchen is free on zh-wp, you can acquire the user name now.--Wing (talk) 14:28, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. - hahnch e n 17:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Magazine number question
I'm currently doing a collaboration to bring Thief: The Dark Project up to snuff, and I'm working on locating reliable reviews. PC Gamer, in this case the UK edition, is something definitely worth including. During my searches, I found this, which allegedly appeared in issue 66. However, you list issue 66 as being released in May 1998. These dates don't fit, because Thief was released at the end of 1998. Do you have any idea what the explanation for this might be, or how I might find the correct date? It'd be great to have that information for the citation. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 00:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I do not Issue 66 of PC Gamer, only the supplement which states that it was published with the May 98 edition of PC Gamer. I believe I just guessed the numbering through looking at the nearest date, which was March 98.  But if you take the numbering from Issue 73, which I can believe is correct, and work backwards - Issue 66 would be February 99. - hahnch e n 16:37, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. February it is, then. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 18:03, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Do you happen to have issue 82 of Games TM?
Asking because I noticed you had several of the issues listed up to a certain point. The retro section of this issue supposedly has a bit on Mike Haggar, and I was hoping to get ahold of it to bolster the character's reception section with another printed source.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:05, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, but I won't be able to get you a copy until a month's time. I do not have that issue at my current address, I do recall a recent issue did have a multi-page Hagger character profile in it.  Drop me an email if you want it. - hahnch e n 16:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

RfA Thanks
MrKIA11 (talk) 12:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Zeno Clash permission
Hello Hahnchen,

I am a french user, also active in seeking permission for free video game screenshots.

If possible, I would like to have some details regarding your successful permissions for the Zeno Clash files, from ACETeam.

Indeed, I believe that knowing more about how other people managed to successfully ask for permissions would help me for future requests.

By the way, you might be interested in knowing that a french user, FR, has significantly expanded fr:Zeno Clash and plans to bring it to Article de Qualité (=Featured Article) Sincerly, Jean-Fred (talk) 21:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The Zeno Clash developers are a small independent studio, and they were very responsive. It's a lot easier to get a response from independent firms as opposed to monolithic public entities with layers of governance.


 * I merely emailed Andres Bordeu, and explained to him what a free license entails and how they can be used on Wikipedia and by third parties. A few important points you should make clear, which should help sell the case:
 * Not all Wikipedias can use non-free content - thus, if you want your screenshots across all languages, free use is best. (In the Zeno Clash case, I specifically mentioned that the Spanish language Wikipedia does not accept any non-free images - given that Spanish is the official language of Chile, where ACE Team are based)
 * Non-free images must be low resolution. Thus, free images make your game look a lot better.
 * Free images can be used in any page where relevant, and even for decorative purposes. This can increase exposure for your game.
 * You can control what free images are released, and can use them to "sell" the best aspects of your game.


 * I think developers acknowledge that their screenshots are pasted everywhere across the internet without any permissions anyway. And so the release of a few select does no real material damage, and as pointed out above, can actually enhance their presence. - hahnch e n 21:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Happy Hahnchen's Day!
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk  • 00:08, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Comment at Commons
The editor to whom you left this comment is currently blocked, also from editing his own talk page, and thus unable to respond to you. I'm notifying you just for your information. Best regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 13:11, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh I was under the impression that blocked users could edit their own user talk pages. - hahnch e n 17:09, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * They normally can, but that (as well as sending wikipedia-e-mails) can be disabled if the situation warrants it, and that seem to have been the case here . The block has now been prolonged to a month, so it may be a while before you get a reply... Best regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 19:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi. I have a comment about that same edit. I wish to suggest you please try to refrain from insults or snark in dealing with other editors, in the spirt of Civility. This applies even if you are dealing with a frustrating person who cannot tell Mondrian works apart :-)  Thanks. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:06, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Then someone else should tell him what Commons classes as educational. - hahnch e n 17:09, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Re:Aquaria
Thanks! That's pretty awesome; added to the article. -- Pres N  19:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

RE Webcitebot: Thanks for speaking up, I totally agree
And I'm upset that this project has languished for so long. user:Agradman as 128.59.179.238 (talk) 21:32, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * You wrote a very nice little essay on the Strategy Wiki. Thanks.  user:Agradman as 128.59.179.253 (talk) 20:52, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for your support at my RfA last week. I'll do everything I can to live up to your expectations and if you ever need help from a janitor please feel free to drop me a line! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:52, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/.hack (video game series)/archive2
I've greatly expanded the development section with sources in Japanese. Does this address some of your concerns? Thanks, Axem Titanium (talk) 03:22, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested
Formal mediation of the dispute relating to Humble Indie Bundle has been requested. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to formal mediation, and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page.

Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 16:14, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

WebCiteBOT Replacement Task Force
Sometime in the past you expressed an interest in getting WebCiteBOT running again or replaced. WebCiteBOT was a bot that submitted links to WebCitation.org in order to combat WP:LINKROT. I have recently started a WebCiteBOT Replacement Task Force to help coordinate an effort to do just that. I am cordially inviting you to express your opinion on the matter if you are interested. Thanks. -  Hydroxonium  ( H3O+ ) 14:47, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Earthquake refinery explosion image
Thanks for clearing it up from the mainpage - however, you may want to point your Commons admin powers over to File:Refinery_explosion,_Japan_2011_earthquake.jpg. If you take a look at Dannychoo's flickr stream, he's been posting TV screencaps etc and claiming they're CC licensed, I'd do an external link check to make sure there's no other copyvios. - hahnch e n 22:52, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Looks that an anon has tagged another image already as disputed licensing - File:Japan_Earthquake.jpg - hahnch e n 22:55, 12 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I've deleted both images (and de-transcluded them across the Wikimedia projects, excepting protected pages that I was unable to edit). Thanks very much!  —David Levy 23:36, 12 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: I e-mailed Danny Choo to inform him of the issue. He responded by removing the CC license tag from the photographs other than the screen captures.  (He told me that he's too busy to go through those until he's established contact with his friends and relatives and returned to Japan.)  —David Levy 02:35, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Magazine request
Hello Hahnchen, I saw your name listed as a source for info from a few of the Retro Gamer magazines. I'm interested in improving the article on the Satellaview games in the Legend of Zelda series and I am curious whether the June 2008 edition of Retro Gamer covers them under its "The Complete History of The Legend of Zelda (series)" feature. If you're not too busy, could you check this for me and if the article does cover the games (called BS Zelda) then would you mind sending me the pertinent information? This would help me a lot. Thanks. -Thibbs (talk) 13:29, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Gah! You just missed me - my magazines are in storage at another address which I was at last weekend.  I won't have access to them again until mid-April. - hahnch e n 21:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah phooey! Well I'll try to remember to ask again around early April if that's OK with you. Also I was wondering whether you happen to have issue #87. You didn't list it at WP:VG/RS but I figured I'd ask anyway on the off-chance since it has an article I'm interested in using to expand a different article. Cheers, -Thibbs (talk) 17:20, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi again. This is just a quick reminder that I'd still be interested in any material on the Satellaview games in the Zelda series from Retro Gamer. If you get a chance I'd love to know if there's any relevant info available from this source. Cheers, -Thibbs (talk) 14:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I got hold of the article this weekend. It does mention the BS games, in two paragraphs, but doesn't cover anything not already covered in the BS Zelda article. - hahnch e n 23:07, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, OK. Thanks anyway. I appreciate you taking a look for me. -Thibbs (talk) 02:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Navy Field
Greetings, you once contributed to a previous AfD on webgame Navy Field, this article is up for deletion again and your input would be appreciated.--Sloane (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Somari
I'm a little confused by your argument for the use of Atari HQ. You clearly took the quotation from WP:V, which seems to demonstrate that every single source used needs to have a reputation for accuracy and fact-checking. Your Glenn Beck example is an argument for changing WP:V, but until WP:V is changed, Atari HQ cannot be used as a source. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 23:40, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

E-mail
Hi Hahnchen. I'll send you a reply by e-mail within the next few days. As an enthusiast rather than an industry "insider", I have limited knowledge of that side of rail ticketing, but I can help with some of your questions. Regards, Hassocks  5489 (tickets please!)  21:55, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Twiggy promo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Twiggy promo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Bravo
"Decorative" -- just so. -- Rrburke (talk) 14:52, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but the image is back. You'll need an admin to just delete it.  It offers nothing over what can be provided in text. - hahnch e n 17:28, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

gamesTM issues 52 and 66
Hi there Hahnchen! It could be boldly on my side, but I was wondering if you could e-mail me those issues. They contain Tim Schafer interviews which could help me to improve Full Throttle article. Thank you. Electroguv (talk) 16:48, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for taking so long in getting back to you. I've been inactive on Wikipedia so didn't check in until now.  I took a look through both issues for the Tim Schafer interviews, neither of them cover Full Throttle.  Try looking for a copy of Retro Gamer, their features are usually invaluable for such articles. - hahnch e n 19:45, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Broken Sword
Hi! Can you vote for Broken Sword: The Shadow of the Templars at FAC again, since I fixed the problems? Best --Khanassassin ☪ 17:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You haven't fixed the problems, they're more fundamental than the changes you've just made. It's not comprehensive, you need to take a deeper dive into sources and come out with a more fully fleshed article.  I've only just read the Retro Gamer article I sent you now, and you've not incorporated any of that into the article, even though some of its points are fundamentally important to the development section.  It delves into Cecil's core inspirations for creating a Templar story, it sets out what they wanted to do differently to the competition (in regards to Monkey Island and "interactive movies"), his choices for characters and settings, the development budget, and his regrets over the PlayStation version (which would be a nice reflection in the reception section of the article).
 * Google also suggests that there is an Edge "Making of" feature too published ~May 2004 - contact User:X201 or User:Steve to see if they have copies. Also ask them if they have any reviews available from 1996.  Contact User:Mitaphane (he may no longer be active) and ask if you can see the reviews in Next Generation Magazine that WikiProject Video games/Reference library/Next Generation Magazine suggests exist (December 1996 & October 1997).  I know it's not advertised well, and is very poorly maintained, but the Video Games Reference Library as linked does contain some useful sources that you can use in future for older games.  You can always drop into WP:VG and ask for help if you need more.
 * I don't want to discourage you, because enthusiastic content creators are exactly what Wikipedia needs, as opposed to barely active snipers like myself. But featured articles need to be well-researched, it's criteria 1c.  I suggest you withdraw the FAC until these issues are addressed.  It may feel long winded after a previous FAC and peer review to say do it again, but my oppose has pretty much been the only review by someone who knows anything about video games. - hahnch e n 22:57, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Edge
hahnchen, hi once again! As you may remember, I asked you for gamesTM issue while working on Full Throttle. I don't work on the article anymore due to lack of info and currently, I'm busy with Mass Effect. An Edge issue from December 2006 which you own has a feature on the game. Can you mail me some scans of it? Electroguv (talk) 10:36, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes I can, but not until 03/03, and at the latest 10/03. I'll copy that and the GamesTM feature that I had listed.  Mass Effect is a current generation title, so you should be good enough solely through online sources, but there might be useful nuggets in there.  Make sure to email me so I know where to send them. - hahnch e n 19:25, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note that I can't get them until next weekend. - hahnch e n 17:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Some confusion as to what you were actually after, but email sent. - hahnch e n 23:21, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot. I'm working on the video game article, by the way. All the best, Electroguv (talk) 16:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Preemptive warning
In light of the burgeoning dispute between you and MikeWazowski concerning Super Hornio Brothers and/or the Unofficial media category, Template:Mario franchise has been reverted to the last stable version; please read WP:BRD and take your concerns to the talk page before this devolves into an edit war. :)  Salvidrim!   17:39, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Not sure what this is for, the discussion is at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games I'm fine with the current version, as stated in the discussion. - hahnch e n 17:49, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * See the Template's talk.  Salvidrim!   17:53, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Both Mike and myself are fine with the removal of unlicensed media. However, if you believe the template should include unlicensed media, then you should include Super Hornio Brothers as a matter of policy.  Not sure what there is to debate. - hahnch e n 17:57, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Romances/archive2
Hello! You left a comment on Featured article candidates/Romances/archive2 to which I have responded to and would like to know if there's anything else that needs to be addressed. Erick (talk) 19:26, 10 May 2012 (UTC)