User:Jkister

Wikipedia has too many ignorant & intolerant half-wit editors whose personal views are more important than simple facts.

Previous problems revolved around [//pyropus.ca./personal/writings/wikipedia.html Ignorant Edit Bullies]. Now it's all completely political. Extremist nutjobs are taking over.

It seems that there's no way to fight it either. They Manipulate Wikipedia's Rules, say "No, I didn't", get one of their co-crybabies to agree, and that's the end of that.

I suggest you read wikipedia for the references only and completely disregard the articles because they are carefully tailored and censored to meet the author's point of view. See Emma Weyant [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emma_Weyant&action=history revision history] and the braindamage done. And just as important, don't consider the references complete. Lots of information/facts are censored and removed after a page is updated with valid/correct information -- so go through the revision history of pages as well.

Seriously, Look at the user pages of (check [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emma_Weyant&action=history Emma's revision history]) and then contemplate the real reason they are censoring [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emma_Weyant&type=revision&diff=1078741772&oldid=1078678231&diffmode=source certain content].

Edit: apparently there are rules against calling out bad editors. My webpage is below.

So there's my opinion. I'm not sure if my own talk page will be censored. but in case it is-- [//jeremy.kister.net/wikipedia.html here's a link to what was written], content set in stone, that will be [//web.archive.org/web/*/jeremy.kister.net/wikipedia.html available on the internet forever] (coming soon).