User:Jts1882/sandbox/test/Archosaurs

The following cladograms were copied from Wikipedia mainspace articles and used to test the Lua module version of the clade using the test template cladeN.

Archosauromorpha
The cladogram shown below follows the most likely result found by an analysis of turtle relationships using both fossil and genetic evidence by M.S. Lee, in 2013.

The following cladogram is based on a large analysis of archosauriforms published by M.D. Ezcurra in 2016.

Archosauriformes
Below is a cladogram from Nesbitt (2011):

Below is a cladogram from Ezcurra (2016), that reexamined all historical members of the "Proterosuchia" (a polyphyletic historical group including proterosuchids and erythrosuchids). The placement of fragmentary taxa that had to be removed to increase tree resolution are indicated by dashed lines (in the most derived position that they can be confidently assigned to). Taxa that are nomina dubia are indicated by the note "dubium". Bold terminal taxa are collapsed.

Allokotosauria
Below is a cladogram showing the phylogenetic relationships of Allokotosauria within Archosauromorpha as recovered by Nesbitt et al. (2015). Ezcurra (2016) also recovered a highly supported Allokotosauria with the same topology (including only Pamelaria, Azendohsaurus madagaskarensis and Trilophosaurus buettneri in his analysis), but noted that Pamelaria is nearly as likely to represent a basal azendohsaurid instead.

Suchia
Below is a phylogenetic cladogram by Butler et al. in 2011 showing the cladistics of Archosauriformes, focusing mostly on Pseudosuchia: Clade names follow Nesbitt 2011.

Avemetatarsalia
Cladogram after Nesbitt (2011):


 * User:Jts1882/sandbox/test/Sauropodomorpha