User:Koberip/OLES2129/Tuesday

Seminar in Week 2:

Activity 1: I found a random article and I want to talk about it. Here is the URL []. This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. In my opinion, it does not meet the requirement of "well written" because it probably can not be understandable to audience. It just simply illustrate the topic with some terminology without giving some examples. In order to evaluate this article to a higher level, it needs give the audience some examples and at least one reference or citation from the academic paper, journals, essays which has been already published in these specific field--philosophy and linguistics. And if possible, talk about its original.

Activity 2: [|"Note that a lexical definition is descriptive, reporting actual usage within speakers of a language, and changes with changing usage of the term, rather than prescriptive, which would be to stick with a version regarded as "correct", regardless of drift in accepted meaning."]

Tutorial 4:

The article I choose is Online Shopping.

1. Terminology

2. History

2.1 History of online shopping

2.2 Growth in online shoppers

3. International statistics

4. Customers

5. Customer buying behaviour in digital environment

6. Product selection

7. Payment

8. Product delivery

9. Shopping cart system

10. Design

10.1 Information load

10.2 Consumer needs and expectations

10.3 User interface

11. Market share

12. Advantages

12.1 Convenience

12.2 Information and reviews

12.3 Price and selection

13. Disadvantage

13.1 Fraud and security concerns

13.2 Lack of full cost disclosure

13.3 Privacy

14. Product suitability

15. Aggregation

16. Impact of reviews on consumer behavior

17. See also

18. References