User:Martin-rnr/Komodo dragon

I'll do a start. The article de:Komodowaran was written by de:user:Pimbura and myself. As Auffenbergs and Murphy et al were only rented from a library, I can't acces these information right now, but we wrote down the gist and some indepth information in the german article.

The Komodo dragon (Varanus komodoensis) is a large species of lizard found in the Indonesian islands of Komodo, Rinca, Flores, and Gili Motang.
 * And Gili Dasami (Ciofi 2004).

A member of the monitor lizard family (Varanidae), it is the largest living species of lizard, growing to an average length of 2 to 3 m and weighing around 70 kg.
 * Average total length of the 226 largest dragon caught in study on Komodo was merely 196 cm (Jessop et al 2006). Though species in the 2-3 m range frequently occur, I would be carful at calling this the average.

Their unusual size has been attributed to island gigantism, since there are no other carnivorous animals to fill the niche on the islands where they live. However, recent research suggests that the large size of komodo dragons may be better understood as representative of a relic population of very large varanid lizards that once lived across Indonesia and Australia, most of which, along with other megafauna, died out after contact with modern humans.
 * In this paragraph, it sounds like humans caused extinction. Since this is a very debated field, I'd like to have a source which attributes extinction of Komodo monitors in the Pleistocene to human presence.

Fossils very similar to V. komodoensis have been found in Australia dating to greater than 3.8 million years ago, and its body size remained stable on Flores, one of the handful of Indonesian islands where it is currently found, ever since Flores (along with neighboring islands) were isolated by rising sea levels approximately 900,000 years ago. As a result of their size, these lizards dominate the ecosystems in which they live. Although Komodo dragons eat mostly carrion, they will also hunt and ambush prey including invertebrates, birds, and mammals.
 * As far as I know, it would be very hard to tell if carrion made up most of the diet. And as far as I know, there has never been a study saying this (Ciofi 2004).

Mating begins between May and August, and the eggs are laid in September. About twenty eggs are deposited in abandoned megapode nests and incubated for seven to eight months, hatching in April, when insects are most plentiful.
 * Komodo dragons often use self-dug burrows for oviposition (Ciofi 2004).

Young Komodo dragons are vulnerable and therefore dwell in trees, safe from predators and cannibalistic adults. They take around three to five years to mature, and may live as long as fifty years.
 * Even in captivity becoming mature takes at least 5 years (Murphy et al 2002, p. 27-28 30-34). 50 years are mere speculation by Auffenberg (1981). The record is held by a dragon in Sydney Zoo which lived for about 24 years in captivity.

They are among the rare vertebrates capable of parthenogenesis, in which females may lay viable eggs if males are absent, producing only male offspring.
 * Completly irrelevant in the introduction. And parthenogenetic vertebrates are not especially rare, they are widespread among reptiles.

Komodo dragons were first recorded by Western scientists in 1910. Their large size and fearsome reputation make them popular zoo exhibits. In the wild their range has contracted due to human activities and they are listed as vulnerable by the IUCN. They are protected under Indonesian law, and a national park, Komodo National Park, was founded to aid protection efforts.

Etymology
The Komodo dragon is also known as the Komodo monitor or the Komodo Island monitor in scientific literature, although this is not very common. To the natives of Komodo Island, it is referred to as ora, buaya darat (land crocodile) or biawak raksasa (giant monitor).

Evolutionary history
The evolutionary development of the Komodo dragon started with the Varanus genus, which originated in Asia about 40 million years ago and migrated to Australia.
 * From where did you take the 40 Million years? According to Amer & Kumazawa (2008), Varanus originated about 60 million years ago. And Varanus also dispersed to Indo-Asia and Africa.

Around 15 million years ago, a collision between Australia and Southeast Asia allowed the varanids to move into what is now the Indonesian archipelago, extending their range as far east as the island of Timor.
 * A collision between Australia would have helped Varanus to move from SE-Asia to AUS and not from Continental Asia to SE-Asia. So I have difficulties understanding the sense of this paragraph. Bte, at 15 millions years Varanus had already reached Australia, as it is proven by fossil findings.

The Komodo dragon was believed to have differentiated from its Australian ancestors 4 million years ago. However, recent fossil evidence from Queensland suggests that the Komodo dragon evolved in Australia before spreading to Indonesia. Dramatic lowering of sea level during the last glacial period uncovered extensive stretches of continental shelf that the Komodo dragon colonized, becoming isolated in their present island range as sea levels rose afterwards.

Description


In the wild, an adult Komodo dragon usually weighs around 70 kg, although captive specimens often weigh more.
 * Usually? This is actually very heavy. The highest weight recorded in free-roaming dragons was 81,5 kg (Jessop et al 2006).

The largest verified wild specimen was 3.13 m long and weighed 166 kg, including undigested food.
 * I heard of other measures as the 3,13 measure was disputed, but this is a field of debate and nobody cares about some cm (my record would be 304 cm, Jessop et al 2006).

The Komodo dragon has a tail as long as its body, as well as about 60 frequently replaced serrated teeth that can measure up to 2.5 cm (1 inch) in length. Its saliva is frequently blood-tinged, because its teeth are almost completely covered by gingival tissue that is naturally lacerated during feeding. This creates an ideal culture for the virulent bacteria that live in its mouth.
 * Those bacteria are not relevant to dragon biology, and many animals possess some kind of pathogene bacteria in their mouth (Fry et al 2009).

It also has a long, yellow, deeply forked tongue.

Senses
The Komodo dragon does not have a particularly acute sense of hearing, despite its visible earholes, and is only able to hear sounds between 400 and 2000 hertz. It is able to see as far away as 300 m, but because its retinas only contain cones, it is thought to have poor night vision. The Komodo dragon is able to see in color, but has poor visual discrimination of stationary objects.



The Komodo dragon uses its tongue to detect, taste, and smell stimuli, as with many other reptiles, with the vomeronasal sense using a Jacobson's organ. With the help of a favorable wind and its habit of swinging its head from side to side as it walks, Komodo dragons may be able to detect carrion from 4–9.5 kilometres (2.5–6 mi) away.
 * It's 11,3 km (Auffenberg 1981).

The dragon's nostrils are not of great use for smelling, as the animal does not have a diaphragm. It only has a few taste buds in the back of its throat. Its scales, some of which are reinforced with bone, have sensory plaques connected to nerves that facilitate its sense of touch. The scales around the ears, lips, chin, and soles of the feet may have three or more sensory plaques.
 * Very dubious, I'd like a more scientific source.

The Komodo dragon was formerly thought to be deaf when a study reported no agitation in wild Komodo dragons in response to whispers, raised voices, or shouts. This was disputed when London Zoological Garden employee Joan Proctor trained a captive specimen to come out to feed at the sound of her voice, even when she could not be seen.
 * Hearing was mentioned earlier.

Ecology
The Komodo dragon prefers hot and dry places, and typically lives in dry open grassland, savanna, and tropical forest at low elevations.
 * In the strict sense, there is no tropical forest on the Lesser Sundas, only monsoon forests. And I never heard of a special preference for any habitat, get me a proof.

As an ectotherm, it is most active in the day, although it exhibits some nocturnal activity.
 * I never heard of nocturnal acitivity, and if this was the case, this would be extremly rare and not even some. According to Röll & Horn (1999, Advances in Monitor Research II (Mertensiella 11)), monitors possess exclusively cones or they form the majority of their visual cells, so monitor night vision is really bad.

Komodo dragons are largely solitary, coming together only to breed and eat.
 * Though they live solitary, I miss a more detailed description of their highly developed social behavior at carrion. They also have a highly developed territortial behavior and a home range, and I miss data about their movements.

They are capable of running rapidly in brief sprints up to 20 kilometres per hour (12.4 mph), diving up to 4.5 metres (15 ft), and climbing trees proficiently when young through use of their strong claws. To catch prey that is out of reach, the Komodo dragon may stand on its hind legs and use its tail as a support.
 * As far as I know this has only been reported in experiments with captive animals. In nature, a dragon doesn't need to get carrion out of a tree by standing upright ...

As the Komodo dragon matures, its claws are used primarily as weapons, as its great size makes climbing impractical.
 * Compare their claws to their teeth and tail. Claws are not important in monitor fights or predator defence, it isn't important in any species of monitor (perhaps in every lizard species).

For shelter, the Komodo dragon digs holes that can measure from 1–3 metres (3–10 ft) wide with its powerful forelimbs and claws.
 * 0,75 to 3,2 m length would be exact (Auffenberg). 1-3 m wide is unlogical if you take into consideration my well-referenced length.

Because of its large size and habit of sleeping in these burrows, it is able to conserve body heat throughout the night and minimize its basking period the morning after. The Komodo dragon typically hunts in the afternoon, but stays in the shade during the hottest part of the day. These special resting places, usually located on ridges with a cool sea breeze, are marked with droppings and are cleared of vegetation.
 * Is a ridge in the shade when it is cleared of vegetation? Afaik they use their burrows and tree shade.

They also serve as a strategic location from which to ambush deer.
 * A ridge cleared of vegetation would be quite unsuitable to ambush prey.

Diet
Komodo dragons are carnivores. Although they eat mostly carrion,
 * See introduction: get me a better reference.

they will also ambush live prey with a stealthy approach. When suitable prey arrives near a dragon's ambush site, it will suddenly charge at the animal and go for the underside or the throat.
 * No, they aim for hindlegs, buttocks or the neck. (Auffenberg)

It is able to locate its prey using its keen sense of smell, which can locate a dead or dying animal from a range of up to 9.5 km (6 miles).
 * As mentioned above, it's 11 km (Auffenberg). Dying animals? Whats that?

Komodo dragons have also been observed knocking down large pigs and deer with their strong tail, as well as deliberately harassing pregnant goats and deer in the hopes of inducing a miscarriage they can consume.
 * Rly? Never heard of it, and sounds quite obscure. Why harrasing for a miscarriage if you can kill the whole goat including it's baby?

Komodo dragons eat by tearing large chunks of flesh and swallowing them whole while holding the carcass down with their forelegs. For smaller prey up to the size of a goat, their loosely articulated jaws, flexible skull, and expandable stomach allow it to swallow its prey whole. The vegetable contents of the stomach and intestines are typically avoided. Copious amounts of red saliva that the Komodo dragons produce help to lubricate the food, but swallowing is still a long process (15–20 minutes to swallow a goat).
 * Get me a better ref for the red saliva. And if it's red due to the blood, it's not naturally red.

Komodo dragons may attempt to speed up the process by ramming the carcass against a tree to force it down its throat, sometimes ramming so forcefully that the tree is knocked down.
 * Awesome story bro, but I think one should travel to komodo and watch 3 m dragon versus 30 m tree.

To prevent itself from suffocating while swallowing, it breathes using a small tube under the tongue that connects to the lungs.
 * Rly? Get me a better source. Reptiles have good anaerobic capacities.

After eating up to 80 percent of its body weight in one meal, it drags itself to a sunny location to speed digestion, as the food could rot and poison the dragon if left undigested for too long. Because of their slow metabolism, large dragons can survive on as little as 12 meals a year. After digestion, the Komodo dragon regurgitates a mass of horns, hair, and teeth known as the gastric pellet, which is covered in malodorous mucus. After regurgitating the gastric pellet, it rubs its face in the dirt or on bushes to get rid of the mucus, suggesting that it, like humans, does not relish the scent of its own excretions.



The largest animals generally eat first, while the smaller ones follow a hierarchy. The largest male asserts his dominance and the smaller males show their submission by use of body language and rumbling hisses. Dragons of equal size may resort to "wrestling". Losers usually retreat though they have been known to be killed and eaten by victors.
 * Very vague, I'd love to have a more detailed description of their highly developed social behavior.

[[Image:Komodo excrement.jpg|thumb|right|Komodo excrement is mostly white as the stomach is not capable of digesting the calcium found in the bones of the animals they eat.


 * So from where do they get the calcium for their bones?]]

The Komodo dragon's diet is wide-ranging, and includes invertebrates, other reptiles (including smaller Komodo dragons), birds, bird eggs, small mammals, monkeys, wild boar, goats, deer, horses, and water buffalo. Young Komodos will eat insects, eggs, geckos, and small mammals.

Occasionally they consume humans and human corpses, digging up bodies from shallow graves. This habit of raiding graves caused the villagers of Komodo to move their graves from sandy to clay ground and pile rocks on top of them to deter the lizards. The Komodo dragon may have evolved to feed on the extinct dwarf elephant Stegodon that once lived on Flores, according to evolutionary biologist Jared Diamond.
 * This occurs extremly rare, and you say occasionally and put it under usual diet? The whole aspect of predation on humans is overrated in this article.

Because the Komodo dragon does not have a diaphragm, it cannot suck water when drinking, nor can it lap water with its tongue. Instead, it drinks by taking a mouthful of water, lifting its head, and letting the water run down its throat.

Saliva
Auffenberg described the Komodo dragon as having septic pathogens in its saliva, specifically the bacteria: E. coli, Staphylococcus sp., Providencia sp., Proteus morgani and P. mirabilis. He noted that while these pathogens can be found in the mouths of wild Komodo dragons, they disappear from the mouths of captive animals, due to a cleaner diet and the use of antibiotics. This was verified by taking mucous samples from the external gum surface of the upper jaw of two freshly captured individuals. Saliva samples were analyzed by researchers at the University of Texas who found 57 different strains of bacteria growing in the mouths of three wild Komodo dragons including Pasteurella multocida. The rapid growth of these bacteria was noted by Fredeking: "Normally it takes about three days for a sample of P. multocida to cover a petri dish; ours took eight hours. We were very taken aback by how virulent these strains were". This study supported the observation that wounds inflicted by the Komodo dragon are often associated with sepsis and subsequent infections in prey animals. How the Komodo dragon is unaffected by these virulent bacteria remains a mystery.

In late 2005, researchers at the University of Melbourne speculated that the perentie (Varanus giganteus), other species of monitor, and agamids may be somewhat venomous. The team believes that the immediate effects of bites from these lizards were caused by mild envenomation. Bites on human digits by a lace monitor (V. varius), a Komodo dragon, and a spotted tree monitor (V. scalaris) all produced similar effects: rapid swelling, localized disruption of blood clotting, and shooting pain up to the elbow, with some symptoms lasting for several hours.

In 2009, the same researchers published further evidence demonstrating that Komodo dragons possess a venomous bite. MRI scans of a preserved skull showed the presence of two venom glands in the lower jaw. They extracted one of these glands from the head of a terminally ill specimen in the Singapore Zoological Gardens, and found that it secreted a venom containing several different toxic proteins. The known functions of these proteins include inhibition of blood clotting, lowering of blood pressure, muscle paralysis, and the induction of hypothermia, leading to shock and loss of consciousness in envenomated prey. As a result of the discovery, the previous theory that bacteria were responsible for the deaths of komodo victims was disputed.

Kurt Schwenk, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Connecticut finds the discovery of these glands intriguing, but considers most of the evidence for venom in the study to be "meaningless, irrelevant, incorrect or falsely misleading". Even if the lizards have venomlike proteins in their mouths, Schwenk argues, they may be using them for a different function, and he doubts that venom is necessary to explain the effect of a Komodo dragon bite, arguing that shock and blood loss are the primary factors.


 * More recent research has proven that venom is really responsible for the effetcs of dragon bites. As an historic theory the bacteria hypothesis should be mentioned, but it is not NPOV to compare on the same level the most recent and reliable research wiht outdated theorys. And Mr Schwenk surely has better reasons for his doubts, but as long as it doesn't read more in the media than "misleading, wrong ..." we should not include it in the article.

Reproduction
Mating occurs between May and August, with the eggs laid in September. During this period, males fight over females and territory by grappling with one another upon their hind legs with the loser eventually being pinned to the ground. These males may vomit or defecate when preparing for the fight. The winner of the fight will then flick his long tongue at the female to gain information about her receptivity. Females are antagonistic and resist with their claws and teeth during the early phases of courtship. Therefore, the male must fully restrain the female during coitus to avoid being hurt. Other courtship displays include males rubbing their chins on the female, hard scratches to the back, and licking. Copulation occurs when the male inserts one of his hemipenes into the female's cloaca. Komodo dragons may be monogamous and form "pair bonds", a rare behavior for lizards.
 * This statement is very unreflected, cuz the komodo dragon is in NO way monogamous. Auffenberg himself pointed out that this behavior is not a very strict pair bond which lasts for the whole life. It's rather that dragons habituated to each other and living in the same area are more likely to mate, this also prevents injuries during combat between males or during copulation. (Bennett 1996)



The female lays her eggs in burrows cut into the side of a hill or in the abandoned nesting mounds of the Orange-footed Scrubfowl (a moundbuilder or megapode), with a preference for the abandoned mounds.
 * the also use self-dug nesting caves in the ground.

Clutches contain an average of 20 eggs which have an incubation period of 7–8 months.
 * Average is 18, maximum 33 (Ciofi 2004).

The female lies on the eggs to incubate and protect them until
 * Totally wrong, they can't even incubate eggs as they are ectotherm. They have been observed to protect their eggs for up to 3 months (Ciofi 2004), but not for the whole incubation period-

they hatch around April, at the end of the rainy season when insects are plentiful. Hatching is an exhausting effort for the pups, who break out of their eggshells with an egg tooth that falls off soon after.
 * Monitor lizards do not have egg teeth.

After cutting out the hatchlings may lie in their eggshells for hours before starting to dig out of the nest. They are born quite defenseless, and many are eaten by predators.

Young Komodo dragons spend much of their first few years in trees, where they are relatively safe from predators, including cannibalistic adults, who make juvenile dragons 10% of their diet.
 * If I remember properly, Auffenberg gives a slightly smaller number.

According to David Attenborough, the habit of cannibalism may be advantageous in sustaining the large size of adults, as medium-sized prey on the islands is rare. When the young must approach a kill, they roll around in fecal matter and rest in the intestines of eviscerated animals to deter these hungry adults.
 * So what? if they smell like carrion, they should be more attractive to the scavenger adults.

Komodo dragons take about three to five years to mature, and may live for up to 50 years.
 * 50 years is an old and mere speculation by Auffenberg. The record is held by a female which lived in Sydney Zoo for about 24 years, and newer estimates (Ciofi 2004) only mention about 30 years.

Parthenogenesis
A Komodo dragon at London Zoo named Sungai laid a clutch of eggs in late 2005 after being separated from male company for more than two years. Scientists initially assumed that she had been able to store sperm from her earlier encounter with a male, an adaptation known as superfecundation. On December 20, 2006, it was reported that Flora, a captive Komodo dragon living in the Chester Zoo in England, was the second known Komodo dragon to have laid unfertilized eggs: she laid 11 eggs, and 7 of them hatched, all of them male. Scientists at Liverpool University in England performed genetic tests on three eggs that collapsed after being moved to an incubator, and verified that Flora had never been in physical contact with a male dragon. After Flora's eggs' condition had been discovered, testing showed that Sungai's eggs were also produced without outside fertilization. On January 31, 2008, the Sedgwick County Zoo in Wichita, Kansas became the first zoo in the Americas to document parthenogenesis in Komodo dragons. The zoo has two adult female Komodo dragons, one of which laid about 17 eggs on May 19–20, 2007. Only two eggs were incubated and hatched due to space issues; the first hatched on January 31, 2008 while the second hatched on February 1. Both hatchlings were males.

Komodo dragons have the ZW chromosomal sex-determination system, as opposed to the mammalian XY system. Male progeny prove that Flora's unfertilized eggs were haploid (n) and doubled their chromosomes later to become diploid (2n) (by being fertilized by a polar body, or by chromosome duplication without cell division), rather than by her laying diploid eggs by one of the meiosis reduction-divisions in her ovaries failing. When a female Komodo dragon (with ZW sex chromosomes) reproduces in this manner, she provides her progeny with only one chromosome from each of her pairs of chromosomes, including only one of her two sex chromosomes. This single set of chromosomes is duplicated in the egg, which develops parthenogenetically. Eggs receiving a Z chromosome become ZZ (male); those receiving a W chromosome become WW and fail to develop.

It has been hypothesized that this reproductive adaptation allows a single female to enter an isolated ecological niche (such as an island) and by parthenogenesis produce male offspring, thereby establishing a sexually reproducing population (via reproduction with her offspring that can result in both male and female young). Despite the advantages of such an adaptation, zoos are cautioned that parthenogenesis may be detrimental to genetic diversity.

Discovery by the Western world
Komodo dragons were first documented by Europeans in 1910, when rumors of a "land crocodile" reached Lieutenant van Steyn van Hensbroek of the Dutch colonial administration. Widespread notoriety came after 1912, when Peter Ouwens, the director of the Zoological Museum at Bogor, Java, published a paper on the topic after receiving a photo and a skin from the lieutenant, as well as two other specimens from a collector. Later, the Komodo dragon was the driving factor for an expedition to Komodo Island by W. Douglas Burden in 1926. After returning with 12 preserved specimens and 2 live ones, this expedition provided the inspiration for the 1933 movie King Kong. It was also Burden who coined the common name "Komodo dragon." Three of his specimens were stuffed and are still on display in the American Museum of Natural History.

Studies
The Dutch, realizing the limited number of individuals in the wild, outlawed sport hunting and heavily limited the number of individuals taken for scientific study. Collecting expeditions ground to a halt with the occurrence of World War II, not resuming until the 1950s and 1960s, when studies examined the Komodo dragon's feeding behavior, reproduction, and body temperature. At around this time, an expedition was planned in which a long-term study of the Komodo dragon would be undertaken. This task was given to the Auffenberg family, who stayed on Komodo Island for 11 months in 1969. During their stay, Walter Auffenberg and his assistant Putra Sastrawan captured and tagged more than 50 Komodo dragons. The research from the Auffenberg expedition would prove to be enormously influential in raising Komodo dragons in captivity. Research after the Auffenberg family has shed more light on the nature of the Komodo dragon, with biologists such as Claudio Ciofi continuing to study the creatures.

Conservation


The Komodo dragon is a vulnerable species and is found on the IUCN Red List. There are approximately 4,000 to 5,000 living Komodo dragons in the wild. Their populations are restricted to the islands of Gili Motang (100), Gili Dasami (100), Rinca (1,300), Komodo (1,700), and Flores (perhaps 2,000). However, there are concerns that there may presently be only 350 breeding females. To address these concerns, the Komodo National Park was founded in 1980 to protect Komodo dragon populations on islands including Komodo, Rinca, and Padar. Later, the Wae Wuul and Wolo Tado Reserves were opened on Flores to aid with Komodo dragon conservation.

Komodo dragons avoid encounters with humans. Juveniles are very shy and will flee quickly into a hideout if a human comes closer than about 100 m. Older animals will also retreat from humans from a shorter distance away. If cornered, they will react aggressively by gaping their mouth, hissing, and swinging their tail. If they are disturbed further, they may start an attack and bite. Although there are anecdotes of unprovoked Komodo dragons attacking or preying on humans, most of these reports are either not reputable or caused by defensive bites. Only a very few cases are truly the result of unprovoked attacks by abnormal individuals which lost their fear towards humans.

Volcanic activity, earthquakes, loss of habitat, fire (the population at Padar was almost destroyed because of a wildfire, and has since mysteriously disappeared), loss of prey, tourism, and poaching have all contributed to the vulnerable status of the Komodo dragon. Under Appendix I of CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species), commercial trade of skins or specimens is illegal.

In captivity
Komodo dragons have long been great zoo attractions, where their size and reputation make them popular exhibits. They are, however, rare in zoos because they are susceptible to infection and parasitic disease if captured from the wild, and do not readily reproduce. In May 2009, there were 13 European, 2 African, 35 North American, 1 Singaporean, and 2 Australian institutions that keep Komodo dragons.

The first Komodo dragon was exhibited in 1934 at the Smithsonian National Zoological Park, but it lived for only two years. More attempts to exhibit Komodo dragons were made, but the lifespan of these creatures was very short, averaging five years in the National Zoological Park. Studies done by Walter Auffenberg, which were documented in his book The Behavioral Ecology of the Komodo Monitor, eventually allowed for more successful managing and reproducing of the dragons in captivity.

A variety of different behaviors have been observed from captive specimens. Most individuals are relatively tame within a short period of time, and are capable of recognizing individual humans and discriminating between more familiar keepers. Komodo dragons have also been observed to engage in play with a variety of objects, including shovels, cans, plastic rings, and shoes. This behavior does not seem to be "food-motivated predatory behavior."

Even seemingly docile dragons may become aggressive unpredictably, especially when the animal's territory is invaded by someone unfamiliar. In June 2001, a Komodo dragon seriously injured Phil Bronstein—executive editor of the San Francisco Chronicle—when he entered its enclosure at the Los Angeles Zoo after being invited in by its keeper. Bronstein was bitten on his bare foot, as the keeper had told him to take off his white shoes, which could have potentially excited the Komodo dragon. Although he escaped, he needed to have several tendons in his foot reattached surgically.

My Refs

 * S. A. M. Amer & Y. Kumazawa (2008): Timing of a mtDNA gene rearrangement and intercontinental dispersal of varanid lizards. Genes, Genetics and Systematics 83: 275-280
 * * D. Bennett (1996): Warane der Welt. Welt der Warane. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am Main. ISBN 3-930612-05-4
 * C. Ciofi (2004): Varanus komodoensis. In: Pianka & King: ''Varanoid Lizards of the World. Indiana University Press.
 * B. G. Fry et al (2009): A central role for venom in predation by Varanus komodoensis (Komodo Dragon) and the extinct giant Varanus (Megalania) priscus. PNAS 106(22), S. 8969–8974
 * J. Murphy, C. Ciofi, C. de la Pennouse & T. Walsh (2002): Komodo Dragons - Biology and Conservation. Smithsonian Books, Washington. ISBN 1588340732
 * T. S. Jessop et al (2006): Maximum body size among insular Komodo dragon populations covaries with large prey density. OIKOS 112, S. 422–429