User:Piotrus/Templates

Good
Welcome with WikiProject invite:

WikiProject

Poland-project specific invite:



Invitation to DYK:

article

Request to use assessment templates:

article

Request to use reflinks: On Bare URLs I've noticed that your article uses bare URLs which are vulnerable to link rot. I've fixed it at [] using the Reflinks tool. This tool together with, can give you a quick and easy way to format almost all bare references in the article. I hope you'll try it out and format your references in the future! --~

Good faith message to potential spammers


 * 1) You are welcome to notify projects like WikiProject Company the proposed or otherwise discussed deletion. You should also add talk page assessments with keywords like Company or Contry to such articles so that they appear automatically on Article alerts for related projects (for example if you add WikiProject Poland to the talk page of an article, any potential deletion of it will be shown to editors monitoring WikiProject Poland/Article alerts.
 * 2) If you are paid for your advocacy, you should disclose this on your usperpage, per Conflict_of_interest. If you are not compensated for your edits, you should state so clearly, because your pattern of edits suggests you are per WP:DUCK, and that's what most people will assume anyway. Through even if you say you are not, whether people believe ot or not is hard to say. Paid-for editors habitually lie, unfortunately, which means that few honest editors in this area of editing face major WP:AGF problems, for which I do apologize. But choosing to edit topic area full of spammers means dealing with the consequences, I am afraid.
 * 3) Please read WP:CORPSPAM and WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES.
 * 4) If you are truly editing those topics without compensation, here's my advice: don't create articles on startups; they will soon find someone and pay them to do it anyway - you are taking food away from some poor spammer. Instead, consider editing topics like (let's assume you are interested in Indian telecoms, for example) Open Access in India, Telecommunications in India, Net neutrality in India or such. They are much more useful for the public, but don't have anyone paying for improving their quality.

Frankly, whether one edits non-startup content or not is a good determinant, per WP:DUCK, whether one is a paid-for spammer or not. Food for thought. Take care,

Assess
Most common assessments:

living=yes

living=no

company

other

Deletion
Speedy


 * real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event

Prods: endorse

bio

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline nor the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

org

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline nor the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

soft

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Notability (software) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

fiction

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

AfD

use 2nd for n-th nom

bio

~

~

org

~

~

soft

~

~

fict

~

~

Arguments
* Delete due to lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources (?) which in turn indicates problems with Notability.