User:Seagull123/XfD log

This is a log of all deletion discussion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's XfD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

January 2021

 * Challengers Friendster: nominated at AfD; notified 16:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Originally created by with the content "Hello Episode". Tagged for CSD A1 by, then an IP editor replaced all of that with the current content. I don't know if "Challengers Friendster" even exists, as I can't find anything for it (or "Cool Spot", which is supposed to be the series this 'episode' is from). Quite a lot of the page appears to be copied from https://darkshadows.fandom.com/wiki/2 (that page is licensed under CC-BY-SA), and the "cast" section seems to be copied from a page about Neighbours. This appears to either be a hijacked article, or possibly a hoax, or both.
 * Robo of Death: nominated at AfD; notified 16:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: While nominating Challengers Friendster for deletion, I came across this article, created in a similar way ( creates it with the words "Coming soon", it's then nominated for speedy deletion, an IP editor then replaces it all with the current content). Most of the article again appears to be copied from https://darkshadows.fandom.com/wiki/3 (CC-BY-SA licence); but the cast section appears to be for a Neighbours episode. Cannot find anything for "Robo of Death", possible hijacked article/hoax/both?
 * One horse pony: nominated at RfD; Target: Joe Biden (notified); notified 17:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I'm not sure what the connection is between the term "one horse pony" and Joe Biden - I can't find a mention of that term at the Biden page, and can't seem to find anything about this connection on Google. Unless anyone can find something about this, I suggest this be deleted per #5 and #8 at WP:RFD.
 * Patriot Party (political party): nominated at AfD; notified 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: While there are news articles about this hypothetical party, I think this is WP:TOOSOON and WP:NOTNEWS - it is based on reports/rumours, and there's been nothing official (yet) - so I don't think it is notable enough to have its own article. If in the future, this becomes official, or there is significant coverage about this, it may warrant an article then; but until that happens, I don't think there should be one now.
 * Parti conscience universelle: nominated at AfD; notified 21:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Non-notable political party. Unsourced article; except for a few external links (the party's website now doesn't exist). I can't find any sources for the party either. It was PRODded by for the reason: No demonstrated notability. Short-lived political party (FR wiki page shows it's defunct) that never ran any candidates. But then deprodded by  who stated that French language sources exist for it. However, I can't see any French language sources, and the French WP page only has one (inaccessible) source.
 * Diane Retallack: nominated at AfD; notified 00:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: This appears to be about a non-notable person (per WP:GNG/WP:BIO). The references given don't appear to be in-depth about Retallack (mostly passing mentions), and a quick search for sources online doesn't appear to bring anything up. A lot of the content itself is unsourced, and the article appears to have been written by Retallack's spouse (Gregory Retallack/ - Gregory's article lists "Diane" as his wife, and see all the COI discussion at the talk there) - I know that's not a reason to delete by itself, but just felt it was important to point it out.
 * Climate emergency declarations in the United Kingdom: nominated at AfD; notified 22:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I'm proposing deletion of this article because: I don't think this topic is notable enough for its own article, and for WP:INDISCRIMINATE/WP:NOTEVERYTHING reasons. It's focussed on declarations at the subnational/regional level, which - based on the sourcing in the article (mostly primary sources/local news reports about local councils) - doesn't appear to be notable. Also, I don't think a long list of local councils which have declared climate emergency declarations is encyclopaedic - [t]o provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources. Although the following concerns aren't reasons for deletion by themselves, I think they're important to note: there seems to be quite a bit of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH in the article, it's incomplete and is unlikely to be completed anytime soon - and even if it were complete, it would likely be overly detailed and long. I appreciate a lot of work has gone into this, so would like to hear what other editors who have contributed to this page think.