User:Slrubenstein/MathSci unblocked

(1) the aggrieved party (2) AN/I thread in which many people debate Mervyn's use of sources
 * Mervyn is criticized for inappropriate use of sources
 * MathSci names the book that Mervyn is using as a source, names the author, and the author's credentials

(3) Another editor accuses Mervyn of a conflict of interest, thus linking the description of the author of the book to Mervyn's description of himself

(4) MatchSci's 14:17 comment on Oct. 16 is Charles's evidence of outing But you need to read the whole thread because context is everything. (5) MathSci leaves messages for Mervyn - is his intention malicious or constructive?
 * first message
 * second message
 * third message

note: these three comments are important as Mervyn considers them evidence of outing. (6) Charles Matthews blocks mathSci for one week; note evidence provided (7) there is much discussion at MathSci's page about the block (8) I unblock (9) I inform Charles Matthews; intention - to be respectful (10) I leave a message for Mervyn; intention - to be supportive (11) The AN/I saga continues - discussion of Charles's block and my unblock and AN/I (12) back to MathSci's talk page, FT2 criticizes my unblock (13) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mathsci/Archive_16#Concerning_my_unblock I leave advice for mathScie; intention - to be strict and constructive. Paul August and Charles Matthews criticize my unblock]

(14) a helpful comment by a third party (15) Mervyn and Elonka leave messages for me

(16) My last conversation with Charles Matthews