User:TenPoundHammer/Archive 3

Stopped/empty
I answered your query regarding the use of the term “stopped/empty” on the AFD page. &#9679;DanMS • Talk 20:38, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

hey leave alone of Tekka Daimyo.. dont deletion on program..

Billy Ray Cyrus
You seem to be in a edit war with 75.33.124.73. I don't know what the story is and enough about the topic to contribute but is there something that can be done to resolve the issue? Is this IP editor ignoring requests to take the issue to discussion?--NrDg 02:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Your RfA
Although I opposed (and apparently caused a few others to oppose), I am sorry about your unsuccessful request for adminship. I was frank when I said that I don't think you are ready yet, and I hope that you don't think badly of me for that. Please don't be discouraged and try to address the concerns raised by the opposing users henceforth. If you do then there's no reason for your future RFA not be successful. Feel free to contact me should you have any question, comment or disagreement. I'll be happy to be of assistance. Best regards, Hús  ö  nd  02:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I was waiting for someone else to say it, for I didn't really know how to express it right. I think the same--I would be delighted to be able to support. A continuing consistent --and careful--record is what will do it. DGG (talk) 19:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

AFD sanity check plz?
Hey there. Could you take a look at Articles for deletion/Pro-Gravity Records when you get a moment? I'm usually pretty good with marginal musicians and associated articles, but there's a few SPAs popping up challenging the non-notable suggestions. I'd like to have another AFD-experienced editor with musical knowledge taking a peek, if you don't mind. Thanks! Tony Fox (arf!) 20:56, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Corrected AFD nomination
It looks like you and I were simultaneously working on correcting the malformed AFD entry for Articles for deletion/Survivors of the September 11, 2001 attacks (2nd nomination). I left instructions for this kind of situation on the contributor’s talk page. &#9679;DanMS • Talk 00:26, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD closure
The next time you close an AfD, you might want to remove the template on the article, and add a note on the talk page with the result of the discussion. Er rab ee 01:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Agent Study Context
You had tagged the page agent study with 'insufficient context' previously, and since then I have made some modifications and additions to it. Could you review your tag placement and consider whether it is still needed?

Dancanm 12:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD on Juan... The Halifax Disaster
Hi,

You recently closed this article's AfD discussion, for the following reason:


 * "The result was Redirected to Hurricane Juan by someone else, no need to keep discussion open. Non-admin closure."

However, this article hasn't been redirected. Are you suggesting that this should occur? Oli Filth 21:26, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert
of my userpage vandalism. It's a hazard of the new page patrolers. You'll get your chance to enjoy that. I'm sorry about your recent RfA, but live to fight another day! Thanks again! Carlossuarez46 21:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the info
I will try to use it in the future!Showbizpage 21:53, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Magnum Carnage
Dang, man. You nominated it for deletion 3 minutes after I created it. You should've given me more time to fix it, but the damage's done. We'll see what the community thinks. Also, you know better than to template someone who's used it a million times. It's rather rude telling me to sign my posts after I've made almost 2000 user talk page edits, which clearly means that I'm perfectly capable of signing everything I write. -- Boricua  e  ddie  21:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Solution: Don't use TW when nominating an article created by an experienced user. -- Boricua  e  ddie  22:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry of I was a bit rude. Happy editing! -- Boricua  e  ddie  22:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Online (Brad Paisley song)
Regarding your revert and edit summary, I understand your concern. What do you think of http://music.aol.com/video/online/brad-paisley/1933391? It's not likely to change (as far as I know), but do you think that the 30 second commercial is an objectionable amount of advertising (links normally to be avoided #5)?  W ODU P  02:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Regarding a link to his AOL video from Online (Brad Paisley song) - AOL Video's usually frowned upon here too, as is YouTube. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 02:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand why YouTube is frowned upon, it's user-contributed and sometimes contains copyright violations. I don't think AOL video is user-contributed, and I do think that there is an agreement between the artist and AOL to host that music video. A search of aol video in the talk, user talk, Wikipedia, and Wikipedia talk namespaces doesn't show me that AOL video is prohibited. Could you explain your reasons a little more?  W ODU P  01:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC) ( copied to this talk page at 18:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC) )

Good call on WWI vets AfD
Yeah that was a definate SNOWballs chance in hell. I would've given it 24 hours but only because of time zones.

Let's hope this article remains up at least a few years before it has to be retitled "last WWI vets to die." davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  03:01, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Editing request
Hi, there-

I've been diligently working on my page (Margolis Brown Adaptors Company) and since you made some comments earlier, I would like to have your input and -if it's acceptable- your vote for it's survival or any advice you may have to improve it. Thanks!

Zena0727 18:53, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Michael Sessions AfD closure
Since you proclaimed this AfD closed, will you be removing the AfD template on this article?, A BLP has been opened, and the person doing it is making accusations of an edit war, so I'd rather stay away from any deletions on that page if at all possible. 64.179.49.62

AfD
As you closed this AfD, you may want to have a look at this one, opened by the same user for the same reasons. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 19:59, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Sports Notability
Hey. I'm not trying to argue the closings of the AfDs or anything, I was just wondering where I can see a guideline for sports notability. Thanks.Eggy49er 20:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll look it over and make sure not to make that mistake again when I AfD an article.  Eggy49er 21:09, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar thanks
Seeing that actually brought a smile to my face. It's been a while since I got a barnstar from anyone (in the meantime, though, the mop has been more than sufficient), and I totally wasn't expecting that. It was just off-the-cuff, really ... I was originally asking whether the essay was salvageable with a totally straight face, then as I wrote I realized it sounded like a TV promo line and finished it up accordingly.

You made my evening. Daniel Case 02:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Hank Aaron
Thanks for closing the silly AfD. I notice that someone's deleted the entry from the AfD page as 'vandalism' - is that the right thing for them to do? Nick mallory 00:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

AfDs
Hi there, I know you are on a run, but can you please take it slow this week on the AfD's while we sort things out? Most of the Malls you are nominating probably will be deleted, but it's overwhelming the system, along with Eyrian's noms. The backlog is huge. Bearian 16:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD for Railpage Australia
Please do NOT remove a valid AfD tag. The template quite clearly says. Tezza2 00:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

When you become an admin I will listen to you. Until then, do not remove a valid AfD tag. The issue is for DISCUSSION. Tezza2 00:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Wikimedia Commons
Would you please consider explaining your comment at this AfD? "Strong keep, nothing wrong with keeping this page" isn't really a valid argument. Remember, AfD is not a vote.  Mel sa  ran  (formerly Salaskаn) 00:34, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD closure on Wannarexia
As I mentioned on the article's talk page, I believe it was premature (at least for a non-administrator) to close the discussion so quickly with the only "keep" vote coming from the article's author and in an assumption of bad faith. Though I don't question that you were acting in good faith, I don't believe WP:DPR gives non-administrators that type of leeway. Also, I was acting in good faith in nominating the article for deletion; please don't forget to assume good faith. Thank you. --Evil1987 00:52, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your prompt response. --Evil1987 00:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Rascal Flatts "Take Me There" edits
The user 24.214.219.183 has been repeatedly changing the chart position for "Take Me There" many times, I left a note on his/her talk page about it but was disregarded. I'm not sure what to do about this.

Vala M 14:41, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I am not exactly up on all the pages and rules and such so I wasn't sure what to do.

Vala M 18:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
For fixing that AfD for me. I couldn't figure it out at all. I'm trying to add a userscript to do it for me so i wont have the same problems. Anyways, thank you!. DurinsBane87 02:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Anna Svidersky AfD
Howdy! On the Anna Svidersky AfD you expressed sentiments to keep the content regarding the notability of the aftermath following her death. I recently created the Mourning sickness article with a section ascribed to Svidersky and the reaction to her death. My intent is to respect the content that you and other "Keep advocates" have wished to retain but still maintain the encyclopedic focus on what is actually notable about Anna Svidersky. If you have an opportunity, feel free to review the article and give me any feedback about what I can do to improve it. AgneCheese/Wine 08:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Grieg's music in popular culture
Hi there. I have tried to fix this article. Can you take a second look and see if it passes the Heymann standard to your satisfaction? Bearian 22:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Here's your barnstar for finding my secret hidden subpage:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
Thank you for closing Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Don't forget to put the oldafdfull template on the talk pages of both articles! TerriersFan 01:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Closure of AfD for Historical persecution by Christians
Hello. While I agree with you that the article would (and should) probably have been kept, I think the closing was way premature... there was a significant enough number of Delete !votes that this really should have been both a) allowed to run its relisted course and b) looked at by an admin. Furthermore, you yourself !voted on the article (to keep it) - a definite non-no for closing users as far as I know. I appreciate you wanting to take the load off of the administrators and all, but it's my personal opinion that (not just for this article) you're a little too quick with the trigger on the non-admin closings. Those who voted against keeping the article will have valid grounds to feel their opinions were not considered by the proper channels, and to re-list the article for further consideration. Thanks for your time. ◄  Zahakiel   ►  16:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I would have to agree. There was not a clear consensus, the arguments for deletion seemed to carry greater weight and the fact that the other articles, Historical Persecution by Jews and Historical Persecution by Muslims, were deleted seems to militate against a premature closing (esp. non-admin).  It would seem that if these types of articles are proper they all would stay and if not they all would be deleted.  Only a fool would argue that only one of those three groups ever engaged in persecution.  I think a review of the closure would be proper.Mamalujo 23:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, all that aside, non-admins can only close unambiguous or withdrawn AFDs. See WP:DPR; this AFD was far from unambiguous, as there were some arguments on both sides that could have been disregarded, plus the reason the AFD was nominated was valid. --Core desat 23:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Historical persecution by Christians. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Mamalujo 06:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

David Ball
Bad and hasty example, but Bob Dylan has The Bootleg Series Volumes 1–3 (Rare & Unreleased) 1961–1991, decidedly not a seminal album, on the page that is his article. And that one's featured, although one look at the fair use template for the album reveals that it might not have any reason to be there. Regardless, if you can find a better image, or if you consider the article to look better without one, be my guest and remove it. Cromag  talk to me  09:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Lists of Lists of Lists
I noticed on a few AFD discussions that you seem to actively participate there. I just stumbled across this mindnumbing category: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lists_of_schools_by_country which contains links to 72 lists that just have no reason to exist. Somehow, I don't think submitting 72 independent AFDs is the right procedure. Any advice as to how to proceed? Kww 16:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Notification of discussion: Guideline/policy governing lists
Given your extensive Wikipedia experience, I'd appreciate your input on the following:

User:Sidatio/Conversations/On list guidelines

Thank you in advance for any thoughts you may have on the topic. Sidatio 01:29, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the Barnstar :) You made my morning! Karanacs 14:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD Nominations
I would appreciate it if you contributed the discussion on pages you feel are lacking in any way or tagging with Maintenance tags before nominating an AfD. This will leave more time for articles to get the attention needed for significant improvement before you assign a deadline for deletion. Thanks MDSL2005 22:42, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Zoomerang.com
I did some clean up of the advertising material found in the Zoomerang.com article that you were supporting for deletion. I think there is hope for it, please take a look. Crypticfirefly 04:24, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Your work on the great mall
Wow, I've got to ask, what made you take an interest in it? It's good work! -_L ucid 04:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * That is probably the most esoteric interest I have ever heard of. Dying...shopping malls? That's a helluva hobby, man! --L ucid 19:03, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

AFD
Would you like to take another stab at becoming an administrator? I think you'd be great. If so, let me know and I will nominate you. Nen yedi  • (Deeds•Talk) 13:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 

 Nenyedi would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Nenyedi to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. -- Nen yedi  • (Deeds•Talk) 18:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * There is a nomination at Requests for adminship/TenPoundHammer 3. I just used the subst template at RFA, and it automatically placed the link to the old one. Nen  yedi  • (Deeds•Talk) 19:02, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi TenPoundHammer, after you placed your RFA nom page on WP:RFA, it has been removed, and then replaced by others. It seems obvious to me from your previous RFA's that you're serious about this, and will be formally accepting the nom and answering the "optional" questions at some point.  Could you remove it from the RFA main page yourself until it's ready, to avoid misunderstandings? --barneca (talk) 19:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Withdrawn RFA
I'm sorry to have opposed but it was poor timing. That you removed it so quickly shows you in a good light and indeed having admin quality judgement in that action. Please, give it two maybe three months doing what you're doing and you can get the buttons you need to help Wikipedia even more. Very Best. Pedro | Chat  21:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I second what Pedro said about waiting 2-3 months. IMO, 1 month would be far too soon.  --rogerd 21:32, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It is very unfortunate that you had to withdraw your Rfa (well I voted neutral on your Rfa though). You are an excellent editor, so come back in 2 or 3 months and we'll I support you definatly. Good luck! --H| H irohisat  Talk 21:51, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I am sorry about what happened too. If you wait a couple of months you should be able to pass. If your last RFA didn't take place 3 weeks ago, I'd have supported you, but under the circumstances I couldn't (though I couldn't oppose either).  New  England  Review Me! 21:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Between Raising Hell and Raisin' Hell
Radioandrecords.com lists the Big & Rich song as Raising, as well as the CD, which is why I had changed it back. Is Billboard listing it as Raisin'? Spell4yr 13:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, R&R listed it as "Raisin'" in their chart highlights, but on the chart itself, it's "Raising," at least online. I would think because the official name of the song is "Raising" that that's what the page should say. http://www.radioandrecords.com/Formats/Charts/Country_Chart.asp is the R&R listing.Spell4yr 04:06, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Harry Potter Spells

 * It is currently under a deletion review. Therequiembellishere 17:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Non-admin AfD closures
Hi,

A few recent DRVs have called into question your ability to understand when a non-admin should close XfD debates. Please do not close any more XfD debates unless: 1) five days have elapsed since the listing and 2) the result is a UNANIMOUS keep. As it is, your controversial closures are creating more work than they are saving, I'm sorry to say. Your next RfA will go much better if you don't have a record of these controversial bad closures. Best wishes, Xoloz 02:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * please, for the important reason that you in general very much deserve to be an admin, don't make the non admin closures you do, especially judging WP:SNOW. There are plenty of other people do do so. Xoloz gives you very good advice above. Frankly, I'd advise simply not doing them at all for a good while yet. DGG (talk) 05:46, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Anna Svidersky part deux II
Howdy! I hope you don't mind the second interruption but there is currently a Request for comment on the talk page of the Svidersky article aimed at resolving disagreements over the outcome of the last AfD. We'd like to get some additional input so that we can amicably resolve those disagreements and your thoughts would be greatly appreciated by all the editors on the Svidersky page. Thank you for your time. AgneCheese/Wine 15:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Help needed regarding AFD article
In the put for Afd by me.I have wrongly added the  AfD debates (Places and transportation).It should  remain in AFD but places and transportation needs to be removed.Thank you. Harlowraman 22:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for your help Harlowraman 22:21, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of article on Inkulab
Hi Ten Pound Hammer! I'm writing in regard to your view that the references there were not good enough. I did not creat this entry but been editing it for a while. Didn't realise that this was nominated for deletion and was gone by the time I actually did. Anyways, was wondering that how come journal article and news entries  from a 150 year old daily (THE HINDU) were not good enough references!! I would like to restart the discussion and would appreciate your help on how to go about with it. Cheers! ώiki Ѕαи Яоzε†αLҝ 08:48, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The paper indeed mentions about him extensively right from the abstract. As mentioned in the article itself his name Inkulab is also spelt Inquilab. The paper is a comentary on HIS work Avvai. I think there had been a misunderstanding on the alternate spellings in English to his name since in Tamil language is pronounced the same as Inquilab or even Ingulab. Hope this makes things clear. Cheers! ώiki Ѕαи Яоzε†αLҝ 22:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I Don't Dance
Hi. In case you're not looking at it anymore, thought I'd let you know that I Don't Dance is on the Billboard Hot 100 now if that makes a difference to you concerning your Delete vote at Articles for deletion/I Don't Dance. Thanks Kinston eagle 12:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

RfC
Dunno if you know about this. Requests for checkuser/Case/TortenGuise. TorstenGuise 13:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

A debate on further action is taking place here in case you would like to comment. TorstenGuise 14:19, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Janesville Mall
I disagree with your assessment on this article. You will need to be more specific on how you believe this article to have lost its' focus.

Diogenes (DiogenesNY 15:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC))

Articles for deletion/Rock Hill Galleria
Hello. I have overturned your closure of that discussion in accordance with WP:DPR. Editors must not close AfDs in which they have participated, and non-admins should not close contested AfDs. Please wait for an administrator to close the discussion. If you want to withdraw your nomination, the convention is to say so and/or to strike the nomination through, not to attempt to close the AfD. Thanks, Sandstein 11:22, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion discusison of Omnitrix
Hammer, I've always found your logic in AfDs superb and I am requesting your help in the AfD on the article in question. It seems to be out of control with fanboys, mostly quoting ILIKEIT, and anything you can do would be a great help. Thank you. (If you could, reply on my talk page).Ravenmasterq 21:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I second Ravenmasterq's assessment. I'm having a similar problem in Articles for deletion/List of government agencies in comics.  WP is no place for fancruft. Groupthink 07:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Arnold the Palm Tree
I was just looking at the comment you made here, and while I agree, it's a Hoax, and I do see you struck out the Speedy Remark, I think if you try for adminship, that's going to be one of the obstacles you'll face, knowing when things should be speedied and when they shouldn't is an important thing for any admin who is going to be involved in deletion to know. Also, that bit of canvassing above troubles me, it would have been far better if you had declined to participate in the way you did. FrozenPurpleCube 02:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

User:TenPoundHammer/BJAODN
is on MFD. — M o e   ε  21:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

uncyclopedia afd
I might have messed things up by trying to fix that afd. I moved the seventh nom page to the ninth, apparently it the user just blanked the seventh AFD discussion. I didn't notice this before I started formatting it correctly. So right now the seventh nomination discussion is missing. -- Diletante 23:53, 28 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Hmm I suppose an admin would have to copy the history over or something. Its no big deal as the noms were probably bad faith and there were only a few votes anyway, If I had been paying more attention I would have just reverted the blanking and removed the template from the article. Oh well, no big deal. -- Diletante 00:00, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD notice
Hi there, TenPoundHammer: It doesn't seem to me that the article Bearcat egg is actually eligible for speedy deletion, so I've started an AfD discussion on the matter instead. Cheers, Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:10, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Splut userbox
The splut image in your userbox is copyrighted. It doesn't feel right editing your userpage, so I'll just pass on the message instead. - Flubeca Talk 00:27, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Ben Bolt
Thanks for that speedy deletion tag, I only had one website where it'd been copied, I have no idea it'd branched onto others. Thanks, friend :-) Scar ian  Talk  20:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, it wasn't copied from that website, which instead copied it from Wikipedia. Said so in 2-3 places.  So I removed the tag.  FrozenPurpleCube 21:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello
I'm User:TheListUpdater, better known as Jonah N. from Labelscar. I've made The Mall at the World Trade Center, Post Oak Mall, and Mall 205, with many more to come, including Altamonte Mall and...Pyramid Mall Ithaca. I plan to relaunch the page as Pyramid Mall Ithaca and use information from Labelscar and DeadMalls. TheListUpdater 22:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Abuse reports.2F66.76.143.218
They are seeking to delete an abuse report you initiated at Miscellany_for_deletion. There seems to be some head scratching at the MfD and your insight would be appreciated at that discussion. --  Jreferee  (Talk) 07:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Your user page, etc...
Hi there!

First and foremost, let me tell you how much I enjoy reading your edits. I'm a huge fan of retailing and a lot of the information you have looked up and found is invaluable.

I noticed you created a sub page on your userpage for Service Merchandise locations. I really enjoyed reading some of the locations.

My question to you is...If I want to create a sub page from my userpage (which I admit is sparse and I'd like to spruce up) do I simply create a new wiki page named User:PanzaM22/name of sub page here

Or do you do it some other way? I never noticed any other users with a sub page until yours.

Thanks so much for the insight, tips, whatever you can provide. Feel free to leave comments or insight on my talk page.

PanzaM22 18:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)  Mike

Tagging of Onivox
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Onivox. I do not think that Onivox fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because I couldn't find Onivox at the portuguese wiki. I request that you consider not re-tagging Onivox for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. You are, of course, free to tag the article with prod or nominate it at WP:AFD. Carlossuarez46 00:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Mall AFDs
Have you nominated any malls for AFD since Cinnaminson Mall? I have been logging all the noms and outcomes that I saw in a table on the talk page of the (rejected) WP:MALL}} for future reference. You are welcome to go ahead an add there any noms you make (or see) and any results. If there is ever a future mall notability guideline, or even a section in [[WP:ORG about malls, the AFD results could be informative. Regards. Edison 03:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Advice
Hi TenPoundHammer. I was wondering if I can get your advice on something (since I'm still new at this, and since from your AfD's you seem pretty reasonable). There's a user that's been confusing the heck out of me. Not in a dispute resolution sense, but in a "Would I be feeding the trolls"-if-I-reply way. See this | discussion. That, and he has some really odd contributions. I was wondering if I should just ignore it, or...? Thanks, -- B figura (talk) 05:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * That's what I was thinking (the AIV bit), but after his looking at his contribs, I got confused since he seems to have so many legitimate seeming edits. (Oddly, almost all redirect-y, but I guess everyone has their passion). But I suppose I should just ignore for now unless it gets really out of hand. Thanks. -- B figura (talk) 14:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Crickfacts
Hi, just wanted to let you know I removed your db-bio tag on Crickfacts as it has been in and out of speedy deletion since yesterday and now has a regular deletion tag on it so that the people who want the article can properly fight for it (as they already have been) If you feel I was in error, please 'talk' me back. Thanks --Tm1000 20:55, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Dragon Ball Z
Dragon Ball Z (film) has been updated with the history of this project since your last recommendation using sources like Variety and The Hollywood Reporter. Would you consider this content worth merging to Dragon Ball Z in a Live-action film adaptation section? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 23:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)