User:Tripodics

 The neologism "tripodics" was coined as a more-appropriate word for software programming and the study of computers. It derives from the oldest known term for automata, as used by Homer, and later cited in Aristotle's "Politics". 
 * There is only one condition in which we can imagine managers not needing subordinates, and masters not needing slaves.
 * This condition would be that each (inanimate) instrument could do its own work, at the word of command or by intelligent anticipation, like the statues of Daedalus or the tripods made by Hephaestus, of which Homer relates that
 * "Of their own motion they entered the conclave of Gods on Olympus"
 * as if a shuttle should weave of itself, and a plectrum should do its own harp playing.

 This usage by Homer, to describe autonomous devices that follow commands, predates by millenia Karel Čapek's coining of the term "robot" (in his play, "R.U.R"), as well as the roughly-contemporaneous introduction of the word "computer".

See [ http://tripodics.com/about/aristotle.html What did Aristotle say about computers?].

20:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

  In Wikipedia article on "Binary prefix"  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix 

Bruce A. Martin further proposed that the units be abandoned altogether, and the letter B be used as a binary exponent, similar to E notation, to create shorthands like 3B20 for 3×220



In Wikipedia article on "Hexadecimal"  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexadecimal from section on "Representing hexadecimal"

The choice of the letters A through F to represent the digits above nine was not universal in the early history of computers. During the 1950s, some installations favored using the digits 0 through 5 with a macron character ("¯") to indicate the values 10-15. Users of Bendix G-15 computers used the letters U through Z. Bruce A. Martin of Brookhaven National Laboratory considered the choice of A-F "ridiculous" and in 1968 proposed in a letter to the editor of the ACM an entirely new set of symbols based on the bit locations, which did not gain much acceptance.

 In Wikipedia article on "Fortran"  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortran

Letter O considered harmful
During the same Fortran Standards Committee meeting at which the name "FORTRAN 77" was chosen, a technical proposal was somehow smuggled into the official distribution, bearing the title, "Letter O considered harmful". This deceptively simple proposal purported to address the confusion that sometimes arises between the letter "O" and the numeral zero, by eliminating the letter from allowable variable names. However, the method proposed was to eliminate the letter from the character set entirely (thereby retaining 48 as the number of lexical characters, which the colon had increased to 49).

Among the "PRO" arguments was the assertion that this would also promote structured programming, by making it impossible to use the notorious  statement as before. (Troublesome  statements would be eliminated, as well.)

The sole "CON" argument conceded that "this might invalidate some existing programs" but noted that most of these "probably were non-conforming, anyway".



Missing images
<HR><BR><BR>

<BR><BR><HR><BR><BR> <BR><BR><HR><BR><BR>

<HR> IF THE ABOVE IMAGES ARE MISSING, IT IS DUE TO INTERNAL VANDALISM ON WIKIPEDIA. TO FIND THE DELETED IMAGES, GO TO:
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bruce_Martin_hexadecimal_notation_proposal.png

OR find the deleted image on Wikipedia at:
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexadecimal

This is MY user page.

The image is MINE.

Any deletion of MY image from MY user page is blatant vandalism. (If the deletion is due to a buggy 'bot then blame the writer of the 'bot.)

I have repeatedly edited the image to include my explicit release, but this stupid 'bot keeps vandalizing my page. Will somebody PLEASE fix (or kill) this vandal-bot.



See [ http://tripodics.com/about/aristotle.html What did Aristotle say about computers?].

20:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

<HR>

<!-- This is a null edit, following reversion of bot-vandalism, per the instruction at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:BJBot as quoted below. Please note that this image is MINE and that I have granted reproduction rights to any and all copiers (while requesting at least some sort of attribution for it). I am increasingly frustrated by the automated-vandalism inflicted upon this and several other images that I have uploaded, to the point where my desite to invest further effort into Wikipedia has become asymptotic to zero!

</i> Read this first Sometimes MediaWiki will report an image not being used when it really is (often in the case of page blanking vandalism), and the bot will tag it in error. If this happens, revert the bot's edit to the image, and make a null edit to the article containing the image (click edit, then save without making any changes). If you do nothing the bot will remove the deletion template in a few days automatically. Archive Archives 1, 2, 3, 4 </i>

THIS IS AN IMAGE OF SOMETHING I DREW WITH MY OWN HAND AND PENCIL! (That, I believe, justifies my SHOUTING of the fact.) Any further deletion of my image constitutes vandalism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Attribution PD