User:Wikiguru64

From my experience, Wikipedia is just a vehicle for historical revisionism, a loud minority externally fund senior editors who do an overwhelming proportion of the editing with special privileges and bots. Most users have never edited a single page, and those who have probably don't notice that their work is cleaned up later.

Bot-editors from India auto-revert minor edits from users who aren't logged in to artificially inflate their edit counts. Those editors then get paid by lobby groups to baby-sit articles of interest, and will simply revert anyone who edits them after a nominal delay. If a user repeatedly re-publishes the edit, rather than trigger the three revert rule the offending edit will be moved within the article, then deleted by a blank account.

I found this out by accident after a minor grammar edit I made kept getting reverted, and I discovered a senior editor was gate-keeping a hundred related articles through a Seychelles proxy. To work this out I actually had to use huggle to back-trace all the edits and pin them on a single source, and make a few dummy edits as bait to see which accounts responded.

There are also other issues where editors from non-English wiki's organize campaigns to raid the English Wikipedia, you will find individual editors who are bilingual publishing on one wiki then using a proxy to extend their edits into the English Wikipedia.

Sorry, I can't provide a source.