User talk:शिव साहिल

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 05:13, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

added proposal 2
hi शिव साहिल, based on your suggestion of indef block, I have added  a  based on your comments. you can move your comment to proposal 1, if you dont agree with 2. cheers. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  20:37, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 13:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Please be careful
Hello. You recently archived three threads on ANI that were still active. The two that you archived after that were closed so that was okay. Please be careful and take a closer look before taking actions on that page. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 02:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I replied on my talk page but I will reiterate it here - it is suggested that threads not be archived until at least 24 hours after they have been closed. That gives editors from all over the globe a chance to see what happened. There is no need to hurry threads into the archive. Indeed there have been several discussions over the years recommending that the wait time of 24 hours and/or letting the bot do the archiving naturally. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 02:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 2019 India–Pakistan standoff; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Please stop edit-warring on the article - and note that the article is subject to discretionary sanctions.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Discussion at Talk:2019_India–Pakistan_standoff
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:2019_India–Pakistan_standoff. Please reply to this query. An absence of any reply within the next 24 hours will be assumed as a support for inclusion. &#x222F; WBG converse 10:25, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Deletion review for Articles for deletion/Shuchir Suri
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Articles for deletion/Shuchir Suri. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:34, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Kunan Poshpora
You restored a version that was written misrepresenting the sources as a WP:SOAPBOX. You are expected to share your specific concerns with evidence. You are free to disagree and raise issues on the talk page. User:Winged Blades of Godric has already caught the main contributor of that page mehrajmir blatantaly falsifying the sources to push an agenda. You should read the sources in detail first before responding. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  14:47, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Shiv Sahil Guleri.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Shiv Sahil Guleri.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Just
came across this old edit of your's; refrain from whitewashing in future. &#x222F; WBG converse 18:29, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I have removed "extremist" per WP:LABEL which forbids use of POV terms like "extremist", "terrorist" and others. शिव साहिल/Shiv Sahil (talk) 17:02, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Please re-read the policy that you cite. &#x222F; WBG converse 15:28, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Libertarianism
Please comment on the discussion regarding the use of the term "right libertarian" to describe libertarians that do not oppose free markets, and that do not make a clear distinction between laissez-faire capitalism and advocacy of free markets. This discussion can be found on the talk page for the Libertarianism article. The term is primarily used in a derogatory way and by self-described "left-libertarians". The individuals described in that article, and in the poorly-titled right-libertarianism article do not typically identify with the political right - or the political for that matter. JLMadrigal  @  13:52, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

April 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Thoothukudi massacre, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See Talk:Thoothukudi massacre Ant a nO 09:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC)


 * I advice to know when to use template abuse on user's talk page. I have good knowledge on wiki policies and guidelines. You have mentioned couple of guidelines. But, don't you know you cannot move a page that already had same discussion and remain as per consensus via admin intervention? --Ant a nO 07:17, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Please be careful of your actions! Don't delete major content without discussion
Me and a couple of editors have found severe issues with your editing recently. In Pages for Atif Aslam and Sonu Nigam you have quickly removed a lot of content without any discussion. They are properly checked for sources and revisions, if you have any concerns contact fellow editors.These are content with a lot of research. You can't remove huge contents like that without proper discussion. Please leave a message if you have any questions or concerns. But if you continue this behavior you will soon be blocked from editing anymore pages.

Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Emmanuel Lemelson&#32; on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 17:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!


Empire AS  Talk ! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be . Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive . This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Empire AS  Talk ! 18:06, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service
Hi शिव_साहिल! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:


 * 1) Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
 * 2) Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
 * 3) Paste  underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
 * 4) Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)