User talk:雨宮鏡心

Kazan school
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kazan school, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Kazan+School.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:35, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Entire Screen of One Game


The article Entire Screen of One Game has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolbasz (talk) 08:45, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Entire Screen of One Game


A tag has been placed on Entire Screen of One Game requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. MadGuy7023 (talk) 12:27, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, I'm DAJF. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Peach John, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 23:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at PlayStation 3, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You can't update a sales figure from 80 million to 86.46 by just changing the number in the (old) 80 million headline, you need to provide a new source that actually says 86.46. McGeddon (talk) 13:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Bōsōzoku. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 09:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Japanese street fashion, you may be blocked from editing. —Frosty ☃ 04:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Vento Aureo
I left a message for you at Talk:Vento Aureo two days ago. Please read it and leave a response explaining your edits.--IDVtalk 17:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Wikipedia is a collaborative project. It is not acceptable to continually undo another's work without any explanation, and then refuse to engage in any of the discussions or questions about the changes. If you do this anymore, you will be blocked from editing. You need to either engage in discussion, or drop it. Sergecross73  msg me  21:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making pointless changes
Please stop making pointless changes. --19:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 20:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Noma (restaurant) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Banner talk 08:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mugaritz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 08:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Noma (restaurant) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Banner talk 08:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mugaritz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 08:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Madchester. Dl2000 (talk) 01:19, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Denis Sinor, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 20:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

April 2018
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 09:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 10:25, 7 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi. I won't review this unblock request (for behaviour that appears to have continued for some time, despite an earlier block), but are you aware that you can add articles to your watchlist for future reference? See Help:Watchlist for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:04, 7 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but this is not really convincing: The previous "warning" and "blocking" did not attract my attention. Until this time, "blocked indefinitely", I realized that the situation was serious. In fact, you have removed warnings here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. So without noticing the warnings, you still wiped them out? The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 08:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)