User talk:110.175.85.10

Warning
Your recent editing history at Boeing 767 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MilborneOne (talk) 07:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Warning
Your recent editing history at Boeing 777 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MilborneOne (talk) 07:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm Raydann. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Women in Qatar seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   04:48, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Poland–Ukraine relations, you may be blocked from editing. ''The reference cited is not related to the content you've placed. Please stop from re-adding this content.'' Harobouri • 🎢  • 🏗️ (he/him • WP:APARKS)  03:43, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Poland–Ukraine relations. Materialscientist (talk) 03:51, 11 December 2022 (UTC)


 * GO AHEAD! I've put the correct source! You will be blocked for making false allegations.110.175.85.10 (talk) 03:52, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Your sources did not support your strong statement. If you searched the web for better sources, you would find that it was a Ukrainian rocket rather than a Russian bomb. This makes quite a difference. Materialscientist (talk) 03:54, 11 December 2022 (UTC)


 * If you look at this article, it was the Russians that fired first. This incident is described in this article: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_missile_explosion_in_Poland 110.175.85.10 (talk) 03:58, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Renown Park, South Australia, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Roundish. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2023 in aviation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Roundish  ⋆  t c) 03:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)