User talk:113.190.46.134

Đừng nghe những gì Cộng sản nói, mà hãy nhìn những gì Cộng sản làm!
.

Tsk tsk tsk misbehavior x2
.

Casualties vs weapons recovered
Hello. I notice you have added similar statements to a number of articles, including Operation Junction City. Specifically "However, the losses inflicted on the VC are debatable. The U.S. estimates were almost exclusively gathered by indirect means: sensor readings, sightings of secondary explosions, reports of POWs, and inference or extrapolation. These numbers are in clear conflict with the number of VC's weapons were captured by the U.S. (only 100 VC's crew-served weapons and 491 individual weapons were captured, a ratio of bodies were claimed to weapons seized of 5:1'"[5] What is the reference for the assertion that the figures are debatable? The reference you provide (a US Army report on the operation) covers the losses reported by US forces and the number of weapons captured, but not your inference that they are inaccurate. Unless there is a reliable source which states this it likely constitutes original research or synthesis per WP:OR and WP:SYNTH and cannot be included. By all means we can include the reported figures and allow the reader to draw their own conclusions but we should not editorialise. I have removed this and other examples now as a result. Anotherclown (talk) 10:24, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
You have been blocked from editing for a period of three months for block evasion (User:MiG29VN). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 05:33, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018
Your addition to T-62 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. (Hohum @ ) 14:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)