User talk:131.111.185.74

I'm sorry, but please don't go around changing English>British and anything else like it, Patrick Stewart is most certainly English AND British and both are valid to use in the article. We have a mixture of both represented on this Encyclopaedia. Τασουλα (Shalom!) (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Patrick Stewart. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Τασουλα (Shalom!) (talk) 16:23, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * ''Do not enforce uniformity

It is not possible to create a uniforming guideline, when such strong disagreement exists on the relative importance of the labels. Re-labelling nationalities on grounds of consistency—making every UK citizen "British", or converting each of those labelled "British" into their constituent nationalities—is strongly discouraged. Such imposed uniformity cannot, in any case, be sustained. [edit]Do not "edit war"! Be aware that "edit warring" with other editors by repeatedly changing the text of an article to suit your views is against Wikipedia policy, and may lead to action being taken against you by Wikipedia administrators.'' Your edits will just be treated as vandalism from now on, and if you continue, you will be blocked. I have warned you and explained everything to you. --Τασουλα (Shalom!) (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
I do not appreciate the hostile nature of your response. "Edit warring" is not vandilism. Please see Edit warring. I understand that reaching consensus on this may be difficult. However British is a legally defined nationality. Including an unambiguous nationality could improve the article on Patrick Stewart.
 * I have not in anyway been hostile or broken the rules on civility. Your view point is valid, so is mine, but what you have failed to take into account is what I wrote above about nationalities, I copied that section from Nationality of people from the United Kingdom. This article clearly backs up and states what I have already mentioned, I was a little hasty and forgot to show you this, apologise. And that warning was automated, I didn't write it! It's just standard procedure. I have to point out that what I am doing is not edit warring but actually removing a change that has no consensus. I have to ask, are you denying that English is an identity? Of course it's not a legal nationality, but it could be argued it's an identity. With English people, we have a mix of some being discribed as British and English, while for Scottish, Welsh and Irish (N) there almost always described as W/S/I, for obvious reasons. There has been much debate about this, it's caused allot of arguments, edit wars and such and it's only in the past two years that it's really calmed down. It's best to leave the nationalities of the articles alone. --Τασουλα (Shalom!) (talk) 18:56, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, I'm Vrenator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Duncan Harrison, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Vrenator     talk   12:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, School debating in Scotland, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've removed it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:43, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

February 2013
Hello, I'm Seaphoto. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Homo, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Sea photo Talk  03:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Virginia with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sea photo Talk 03:41, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Aylesbury Grammar School. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 04:47, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm Clarkcj12. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to NBD because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Clarkcj12 (talk) 23:40, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Jacques Derrida
This edit summary ("Undoing a spate of random page vandalisms with common motive") is an unsubstantiated personal attack. Please indicate the sources you used when you add information that is controversial or likely to be challenged. It is not fair to expect other editors to keep searching for sources when you add text without sourcing it. --Omnipaedista (talk) 18:01, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Poles in the United Kingdom because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:50, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Chris Evans (presenter)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. An edit that you recently made to Badger seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 11:53, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

October 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at NXIVM, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   13:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to NXIVM. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  General Ization  Talk   13:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019
An edit that you recently made to Adam Smith seemed to be a test. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. - Epinoia (talk) 01:52, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to London Bridge, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - Epinoia (talk) 01:57, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jordan Henderson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:59, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Ladyman (June 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dreamy Jazz was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Ladyman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:James Ladyman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:James_Ladyman Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dreamy_Jazz&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:James_Ladyman reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 14:28, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi!
It's about time Ladyman has an article on him in Wikipedia. Are you a student of him? --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 13:17, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:CJ concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CJ, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:CJ


Hello, 131.111.185.74. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CJ".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 01:40, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:James Ladyman concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:James Ladyman, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:James Ladyman


Hello, 131.111.185.74. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "James Ladyman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)