User talk:175.137.72.188

February 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Indus Valley Civilisation. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  17:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Calling editors Nazis and using talk pages as a forum can lead you to be blocked
See WP:CIVIL and assume good faith. Talk pages are not there to vent your opinions on Western sources or any ethnic groups. They are for positive suggestions on how to improve an article. So, if you don't like a source, find sources that meet WP:RS and offer a different point of view. Read WP:NPOV and search for good sources, try to improve the article. Some of your edits are doing that which is great. Others are not. Note that I'm not going to block you myself, but if you aren't more constructive then someone, yes, maybe me, might take you to WP:ANI. Doug Weller talk 06:26, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia '''you may be blocked from editing without further notice. '-'' LouisAragon (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Falooda— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Civility and messages to other users
The message that you left for LouisAragon on his/her user talk page was unacceptable behavior and violated Wikipedia's policies on civil conduct and the engagement in making personal attacks toward other editors. Your discussions, comments, messages, and communications with other editors on Wikipedia are expected to comply with these policies, at all times, and without exception. Please do not repeat the this behavior, and do not leave messages or comments like the one you left LouisAragon moments ago. Be respectful toward other editors and treat them in the manner that you would want and expect to be treated. If your collaboration and communication with other users continue to violate these policies, you will be blocked from editing. Thank you -  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:24, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If you revert my edit and restore your message to LouisAragon's talk page again, you will be blocked from editing. Do not revert the edit I made removing your message. It was uncivil and it was removed for that reason...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:26, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Falooda shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  19:26, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm Loved150. An edit that you recently made to Rum seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Loved150 (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as done at Falooda. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; talk 20:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * If you file another spurious report at the Edit Warring Noticeboard, you will be blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)


 * You were previously blocked for edit warring, and yet you are right back at it in the Rum article. Do not re-add the contested material about Indian origin to the article. What you need to do is discuss the matter at Talk:Rum. If you can gain consensus among editors at the talk page that the material should be included, only then can it be added. —C.Fred (talk) 13:49, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Stop accusing everyone of Eurocentrism and bigotry already
WP:Assume good faith is a fundamental site principle and if you aren't even going to try to follow it, you should leave.

You've accused editors who disagreed with you of being Persian, including one user whose userpage suggests that he's Dutch.

You've per-emptively accused people you've never even spoken with of Eurocentrism on multiple occasions.

That gives the impression that you're not interested in cooperating with others. Even if you imagine that you're supposedly interested in cooperation, accusations and name-calling before you've even met people gives them no reason to cooperate with you. Wikipedia is not a place for you to start fights on or for you to wage some crusade on. If you want to help, recognize that other people are trying to help as well.

In short: drop the attitude or we'll drop you. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sigiriya into History of gardening. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Fountain. ''Extremely long history of disruptive editing. -'' LouisAragon (talk) 12:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - LouisAragon (talk) 17:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 17:36, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.