User talk:19dreiundachtzig

Hello, This is my talk page 19dreiundachtzig please post at the bottom of the page unless you are replying to a discussion. In that case post at the bottom of the discussion. Don't forget to sign you post.

Your draft article, User:19dreiundachtzig/sandbox


Hello, 19dreiundachtzig. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 12)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:19dreiundachtzig/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:19dreiundachtzig/sandbox


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:19dreiundachtzig/sandbox, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review Liz Read! Talk! 01:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

I’m going to warn you that should you post one more comment or hoax page, or do anything else suggesting you are WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia, I am going to ask for you to be blocked from editing any further. You have done nothing but peddle incoherent run-on sentences which at best contain crank mathematics. please take note; this user has gotten more than enough WP:ROPE (see the history of this talk page; this user has been doing this for 7 years now…). Jasper Deng (talk) 05:20, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 12:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

It's been brought to my attention that this weirdness, which I reverted, was in fact your handiwork. Viewed together with your numerous warnings and the previous IP activity logged in a sockpuppet investigation, this makes it clear that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Favonian (talk) 12:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Adding to the above