User talk:2001:470:1F2D:C:0:0:0:6

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (2001:470:1F2D:C:0:0:0:6) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! -BigDwikitalk 01:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Young Forever (talk)   00:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bob's Burgers (season 10)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 01:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as done at User talk:YoungForever. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. v/r - TP 01:21, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * your typical Wikipedia dick. Talks a lot, does naff all for content improvement and has thin skin. Just avoid him.  Cassianto Talk  09:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Suggestions
If you have disputes over the content of some article, you should try starting a discussion on the relevant article talk page. I note Talk:Duncanville (TV series) hasn't been edited in nearly 1 month. In addition, if someone posts on your talk page, feel free to respond on your talk page. Most editors prefer discussions stay in the same thread anyway, unless they need to be moved to somewhere else, like the article talk page. Moving a discussion from your talk page to some other editor's talk page is often unnecessary and can make it more confusing to follow. Feel free to ping relevant editors to the discussion if you think they may not come across it by themselves, unless you've been asked not to. If your IP is highly dynamic, it can sometimes be difficult to hold discussions on your talk page since it's continually changing, that's one advantage of registering but it seems like this isn't a problem for you anyway. Also, even if someone doesn't ask you to stay away from their talk page, per WP:OWNTALK and WP:UOWN you should not generally revert someone's removal of a discussion from their own talk page. If you absolutely must respond to something they said and they didn't ask you to stay away, then it may be acceptable to open a new discussion without reverting. (This means the discussion is confusing, but if it's a choice between that and violating owntalk, it's probably better not to violate owntalk.) But frankly 99.9% of the time, if someone removes some discussion from their talk page, it's probably better to either drop it, or bring it somewhere more appropriate like an article talk page. Use common sense for exceptions. (E.g. if someone removes a discussion saying 'No response, I think this is resolved' it's probably acceptable to revert if you do have a response, explaining why you did so and why it took a while to respond.) Nil Einne (talk) 07:48, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * That's fine, but when a user reverts the discussion but adds a reply to the edit summary, that leads a user to think a reply is appropriate. 2001:470:1F2D:C:0:0:0:6 (talk) 11:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC)