User talk:2006nishan178713

November 2021
I have blocked you as the result of the above section; the article was mostly unedited sections of https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-are-the-natural-resources-of-bhutan.html. I previously warned you about 8 different copyright violations and said "Further copyright issues will result in you being blocked from editing". If you want to be unblocked, you will have to demonstrate a better understanding of copyright and an understanding not to copy from sources. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 16:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)


 * I am really sorry. I underestimated copyright violations. I promise I would never do it again. I have now gone through WP:COPYRIGHT and have understood it. I realized my problem by reading WP:COPYOTHERS.
 * Please give another chance to correct myself.
 * Thanks. User:2006nishan178713 16:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I think this appeal might end up being declined. It would probably help you if you were a little more specific with what you would do different, and how you would specifically avoid instances where you copied in something word for word. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 17:27, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If he wants another chance, give him that chance. WP:ROPE? Declining unblocks isn't helpful. Maybe this thing will solve everything for him. Earwig's Copyvio Detector. It surely did for me.:)--Filmomusico (talk) 16:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * What is particularly troubling, even more so than the copyright violations themselves, was that 2006nishan178713 appeared to notice that a bot had flagged their article for potential copyvio, logged into the copyright patrolling interface, and marked their own article as "no action needed", which seems like a clear attempt to evade scrutiny. I agree with ToBeFree's advice. DanCherek (talk) 17:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Can you provide prove of that? I don't know how it works on deleted articles.--Filmomusico (talk) 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * This is my first time doing this kind of mistake. I had intentionally reviewed my article which I am really sorry for. Please give me a single chance to correct myself, I promise I would never do it again. And if I do, administrators are free to block me permanently. Please!
 * Good Day! User:2006nishan178713 18:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I guess, stuff happens. We all need to assume good faith of the editor and give him rope.--Filmomusico (talk) 18:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The problem is, the user did have multiple second chances already. The initial warning about multiple copyright violations by Moneytrees was a second chance offer. Five days later, Nanda Devi Plutonium Mission was created with copied content. I have noticed and highlighted this issue using "mark" HTML tags (usually a yellow background) at "Nanda Devi Plutonium Mission" after a request for feedback. The issue was addressed by 2006nishan178713 on the same day. Five further days later, Natural resources of Bhutan was copy-pasted together from Britannica and World Atlas. If it was an intentional attempt of deception, the trust is currently too broken for an unblock. If it was an accident, the competence is currently too low for an unblock. This is not "stuff happens", this is "some people should currently not edit Wikipedia". ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If he is blocked indefinitely how will he prove that his edit habbits have changed in say a month or so?--Filmomusico (talk) 19:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , As described in the decline explanation, we assume that people can learn and change over time. 2006nishan178713 has proven that 10 days were not enough time for this process to happen, yet requests an unblock less than 60 minutes after the block notification, and less than half a day after the previous decline. An often-used, tried-and-tested approach is the "standard offer", which proposes 6 months. It does not have to be 6 months in this case here, but certainly more than a day or two. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Well ok, lets say he will issue an unblock request in 2 day time, will you assume good faith? I personally believe that an oversight will be required for any future edits by this editor. :)--Filmomusico (talk) 19:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The unblock request is still active. Please unblock me. I would never do it again, as stated earlier User:2006nishan178713 18:42, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Believe in me, I will never do this kind of things again.
 * I would be happy to get an oversight by someone who could monitor my edits User:2006nishan178713 11:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I am leaving Wikipedia as of now. User:2006nishan178713 05:24, 14 November 2021 (UTC)


 * You've had your "single chance" multiple times, as described above. I'm starting to repeat myself. While you're waiting, please inform yourself about the difference between a block and a ban. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:06, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Unblock Request
2006nishan178713 08:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * , the current revision of your sandbox, section "Function and duties", contains a complex paragraph describing what copyright is, and what the Copyright Office does. Did you write this text in your own words, or did you copy it? If you have copied it, why isn't it marked as a quote? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I would not essentially call it a quote. It contains my words and some words from the copyright act. 2006nishan178713 03:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * As it is in the sandbox, I have underlined the lines which have been directly taken from the Copyright Act.2006nishan178713 03:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I have fixed some issues in the sandbox. 2006nishan178713 05:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * It's too closely paraphrased to https://copyright.gov.in/frmfaq.aspx for my personal liking; I'll let someone else review. I had written something about "multiple months, or possibly even a few years" and stand by this recommendation. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)


 * when you said I had no idea about the copyvio detector before. After using the copyvio detector, I had published 3 articles in Wikinews without any copyright issues. If I had known about the copyvio detector, I would have removed the copyrighted materials., gave me strong doubt if you truly understand what copyright is. Can you tell me if Robert M. Huffstutler has any copyright issues? —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 18:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The article Robert M. Huffstutler is a highly suspected copyvio article with a similarity of 82.9% with https://fas.org/irp/agency/nga/leaders.pdf 2006nishan178713 18:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Clarifying, I do clearly know about copyright.   is an instance from a point of time in the past. 2006nishan178713 18:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * that confuses me. Why would you need earwig tool to see if something is copyrighted when you know on which site it is already available? Also: whats public domain? Could you explain it from the perspective of wikipedia? —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 19:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Public domain is actually work that is not copyrighted and is free to use. Most content from the governments like images and text are of public domain. 2006nishan178713 19:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * These are some examples of public domain images-
 * Answering your first question, I had mentioned earlier that I didn't know about the policies clearly but now I do know it well. 2006nishan178713 19:11, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Also I had mentioned in my previous unblock request that the . 2006nishan178713 14:59, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

:(
@Yamla, What shall I do then? I have really changed a lot and I can prove it, if I get a last chance. 2006nishan178713t@lk 13:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You are free to request another unblock; another admin would review it. I don't believe there's anything you can say that would cause me to support your unblock. --Yamla (talk) 13:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not gonna do that anymore. I have already appealed an unblock for 5 times and I am not that desperate (sorry if I sound rude, but I am not at all rude or angry). Have a nice day! Cheers!
 * Bye 👋 2006nishan178713t@lk 13:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)