User talk:217.19.208.101

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages, and customize the appearance and behavior of the website
 * Rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed
 * Utilize a vast array of editing tools

In addition, your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;). Happy editing! RashersTierney (talk) 21:42, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Cutting and pasting from Google Translate
While this may sometimes be a useful tool to get a broad understanding, it is not sufficiently reliable for inclusion directly into articles, as you did here from this. RashersTierney (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * see Talk:Transnistria about Republica Moldovenească Nistreană --217.19.208.101 (talk) 12:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes, basically vandalism
Don't make large changes without an actual reliable source, like you've been doing the last couple hours. And even if you have a real source, the text you write needs to make sense. Ratemonth (talk) 23:16, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

re: your message
Hi, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek  . 69  talk 22:23, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Sheriff Edits
Please stop adding back unreferenced content about friendly / rival clubs and those ridiculously long "famous players" sections. All content should be sourced to reliable references and any "Famous players sections" should have clear inclusion criteria stating why the players are there. random lists of foreingers are not helpful, and constitute original research. Fenix down (talk) 10:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have the criterion. Read the article carefully. Stop your vandalism. It degrades the article. Alas, I live in Dubossary. Yesterday came into direct contact with the player of FC Sheriff. Even current squad was is not true in the article. --217.19.208.106 (talk) 13:10, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry to say but you don't have any criterion at all. References to the National Football teams page and a section of the FC Sheriff website are not clear inclusion criteria. Firstly the NFT page is simply a listing of players who have played for the club and also at some point in their careers been capped internationally. Simply being capped, particularly when it may well have been before or after they played for Sheriff does not inherently make them notable players for the club. The fact that this produces a long list should also indicate that they are not notable within the club simply because they have been capped as there are so many of them. Players are also not simply notable because they are foreign. The second reference to the FC Sheriff page is just a potted history of the club, rather than an official hall of fame or something. Simply because a player is mentioned here does not mean they are notable within the club either. It would be much better if they were mentioned within the body of the article rather than just in a long list of players. It would be much better for such a section to start with comments along these lines: "This section contains a list of players who have played more than x times (where I would adivse x to be a number greater than 100) or scored more than y goals (where y is a number greater than 100 for a career or 20 for a season)". there is no fixed criteria needed, you are free to come up with your own, but they must be there and they must be clear enough that they do not lead to a huge list of players, otherwise the list is simply your opinion of who is notable, is therefore original research and should be removed.
 * Regarding the rivalries / friendly clubs section, this is completely unreferenced and is therefore OR as well. You mention in your comment above that some things aren't true. Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not about truth, but about verifiability. As such all content needs to be referenced to reliable sources and where it is not it can be challenged and removed.
 * I don't want to get involved in an edit war here, so if you have any issues with what I have said, please go to WT:FOOTY and start a thread where we can gather consensus on the matter. Additionally, you may want to open an account rather than editing from an IP as it will make it easier to discuss matters and it would be very good to have an editor who is able to knowledgably contribute to articles on Moldovan and Transneistrian football. Fenix down (talk) 09:38, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of famous FC Sheriff former players concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of famous FC Sheriff former players, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:10, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of famous FC Sheriff former players


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 14:27, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Transnistria, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —DIYeditor (talk) 07:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.