User talk:24.21.161.89

December 2023
Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Espelette pepper, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AgisdeSparte (talk) 02:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
I rolled back your edits to 2023 U.S. Senate sex tape scandal, but unfortunately wasn't able to explain fully because of the specific edit method I used. Besides the fact that naming the people involved is still under debate on the talk page, the main issue was one of the sources: Sportskeeda is not considered a reliable source. And Jezebel's reliability is debatable. Paris1127 (talk) 04:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * OK. But the announcement that came out of Senator Cardin's office specifically named Aidan.  I understand and sympathize with Aidan since he is young and made a mistake and having a wikipedia article with his name may harm him in the future, but at the same time he posted the video to a public forum, then tied it to his boyfriends account, not the smartest move.  It would be in his best interest for this whole article to be buried, but unfortunately wikipedia is not censored (like the video was by all the news outlets).  I'll leave this one to your call and that of others. 24.21.161.89 (talk) 06:06, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I mentioned the notability discussion, but the rollback was mostly about the sources. Paris1127 (talk) 14:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Help with archiving
The two items you thought you archived, were actually not archived, just deleted. If you need help with setting up archiving, see Help:Archiving a talk page. If you'd like to archive manually, check out OneClickArchiver, or you can ask for help at the Help desk. Mathglot (talk) 07:41, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * They are not deleted as they still exist in talk page history and can be accessed. Some of what you posted was vitriolic and from my view unhelpful, and I personally want to just move on and be a helpful editor from this point forward.  Thanks for the suggestion I will look into a one click archiver.  24.21.161.89 (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Sodom and Gomorrah, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 02:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Crackhead Barney
Hi there, I reverted your edits to Crackhead Barney as the first reference does describe them as a "performance artist". Wikipedia relies on reliable, secondary sources to verify content. It looks like you may be basing your interpretation of what a performance artist is - that is original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Adam Black talk &bull; contributions 23:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Adam. Thanks for reaching out.  If the subject of the article was about "water buffalo", and I inserted a photo of a Zebra and claimed it matched the subject of the article "water buffalo", then I think most readers and editors would take objection and claimed I misidentified the subject matter.  This is an article about a celebrity stalker who makes a name for herself by invading the privacy of celebrities and use them to promote herself.   What she is doing is not "art", but extreme conduct that runs roughshod over the rights of others.  If an interviewer approaches a celebrity in public, that seems fair game.  Following Alec Baldwin into a private business on private property to harass him is not ambush interviewing but it is stalking.  It's also not "performance art" by any standard.  Granting her that label makes me question the sources credibility.  Since when is stalking and harassment "performance art". Anyway.  I think some of her content may impinge on Alec Baldwin's right to privacy and raises WP:BLP concerns.  24.21.161.89 (talk) 05:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)