User talk:2601:447:4080:10:F9B1:5BA1:2B3C:364F

August 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Aaron Sorkin—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:33, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Not buying into the argument that mentioning details of how Aaron Sorkin first got involved with The Trial of the Chicago Seven is "unconstructive."2601:447:4080:10:F9B1:5BA1:2B3C:364F (talk) 15:43, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Super Goose 007 ( Honk! ) 17:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

His own words are very "verifiable" and a "reliable source". Am waiting for another New Generation propagandist to make up a poor excuse.2601:447:4080:10:F9B1:5BA1:2B3C:364F (talk) 17:51, 8 August 2020 (UTC)