User talk:2601:646:201:57F0:246:89EB:87C0:F4D4

Blocked

 * can you explain this block? The only relevant discussion that I can see is at User talk:2601:646:201:57F0:E375:79A4:4F64:36FB, which arguably falls short of WP:BEFOREBLOCK. Is there another discussion somewhere that I'm missing? – bradv  06:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * That was the only discussion. There highly eccentric formatting on articles and talk pages was a major issue; their response at the above link showed such an extreme attitude problem that I felt a block was appropriate. Graham87 (talk) 13:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * "Highly eccentric"? It was a bare link, which is not at all unusual. But instead of having someone come along and improve their formatting, they were reverted, twice, and then had their messages on the talk page deleted. Then they were blocked for a year with no explanation. I am reversing your block, as this is a completely inappropriate way to treat newcomers, and contravenes the blocking policy. –  bradv  16:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * OK. In my time editing Wikipedia I have never ever encountered an editor who, when legitimately wanting to add a message to a talk page, just posted a bare link and nothing else ... many many times. I honestly don't think this is a newcomer; I think this is someone yanking our chains, as demonstrated by the talk page message you linked above along with the proloficity and consistency of their ... rather unusual ... editing practices. Graham87 (talk) 07:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)