User talk:2yechan

August 2019
Hello, I'm KAP03. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cocomelon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. --KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 17:41, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Cocomelon – Nursery Rhymes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cocomelon – Nursery Rhymes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cocomelon – Nursery Rhymes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 18:48, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello 2yechan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Cocomelon – Nursery Rhymes, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:2yechan. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 20:46, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

User 2yechan works as an intern for Treasure Studio Inc and was given the task of furthering the Wikipedia page. One was not directly compensated for writing any information on Wikipedia, but rather as a passive task. As such, the user did not expect to run into such complications. As you may find, CoCoMelon lacks presence on the internet, under direct discretion of the company to maintain privacy. Please understand this choice and allow me permission to continue editing as I find nothing inherently malicious or deceitful in this Wikipedia page.


 * A couple of things. Per Wikipedia's paid editing policy:

"Interns, on-loan staff, and unpaid workers, including volunteers, are deemed to be employees. If they are directed or expected to edit Wikipedia as part of their tasks, they must make a paid-contribution disclosure."
 * Disclosure is required for this reason. Please make use of the paid template on your userpage to disclose the name of your employer and every client you are being directed to write about.
 * Also, Wikipedia is not for advertising or publicity. Wikipedia articles are not written for a person/company/thing to become notable; they must already be notable to be considered for inclusion. Significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources is required to establish notability. Wikipedia has no interest in what a company wants to say about itself or its own works. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 00:36, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU
Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 11:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)