User talk:35.134.67.138

== August 2022 =

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 French presidential election. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 15:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 French presidential election, you may be blocked from editing. lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 15:27, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 French presidential election. lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 15:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

I'm not listening. My editing is none of your beeswax

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DanCherek (talk) 15:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2022
Hello, I'm Dudhhr. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Answers in Genesis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  dud  hhr  Contribs(he/they) 21:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi. Nothing about what I wrote was vandalism. True, I do have a history of vandalism but I have changed and I want to be a good editor that contributes to neutrality. I thought it was unfair to use some of the opinionated language in that article. I just made some slight changes to make it a more balanced article. I think that Wikipedia should give people the facts and let them decide for themselves what organizations or religions are correct. As for now, I am bringing back my edits. If you think what I wrote was unconstructive, let me know why and I will take care of it. Thanks! 35.134.67.138 (talk) 00:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Answers in Genesis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Just plain Bill (talk) 23:46, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Answers in Genesis. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 00:14, 6 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I never stated any sort of opinion. Where did I state an opinion? I think that the article was very strongly stating an opinion before, and I feel like I made the language more neutral. 35.134.67.138 (talk) 00:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Answers in Genesis.  dud  hhr  Contribs(he/they) 00:55, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Answers in Genesis) for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 10:44, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Fieryninja. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Gollum have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Fieryninja (talk) 19:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, I'm TLJ7863. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TLJ7863 (talk) 02:12, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. TLJ7863 (talk) 02:24, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Larry Hockett (Talk) 02:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Materialscientist (talk) 02:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)