User talk:49.178.184.162

December 2021
Hello, I'm VeryRarelyStable. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Issues in social nudity. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —VeryRarelyStable 07:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I know that Wikipedia is uncensored. But those are photos of children! Do you understand the difference?49.178.184.162 (talk) 09:33, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Laterthanyouthink. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Angas Street, Adelaide, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:33, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Issues in social nudity, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:37, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * My edit was constructive.49.178.184.162 (talk) 09:48, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Issues in social nudity. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Please discuss this issue on the talk page of the article in question. —VeryRarelyStable 10:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I know that Wikipedia is uncensored. But those are photos of children! What don't you understand? 49.178.184.162 (talk) 10:13, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:44, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Issues in social nudity) for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 10:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Please note that Wikipedia is not censored for any reason. If you don't wish to view images that might offend you, you can suppress their display, see instructions at WP:NOSEE. You are free to edit the rest of the encyclopedia at this time; you may also edit Talk:Issues in social nudity to collaborate with other editors and discuss concerns. 331dot (talk) 10:08, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I'm not offended. But others are. Plus, these are photos of underage people. What don't you understand???49.178.184.162 (talk) 10:12, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The images are scientifically appropriate and not gratuitious. But I'm not here to debate it. If you have an argument preferably based in Wikipedia guidelines to make that images of nudity are not appropriate on an article about nudity, please do so on the article talk page instead of edit warring. It's going to be hard for you to overcome WP:NOTCENSORED, though. 331dot (talk) 10:18, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Hang on, you say you're not going to debate, but you want me to debate?49.178.184.162 (talk) 10:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * What I am saying is that if you want to see a particular course of action, you need to discuss it with the other editors that follow that article and arrive at a consensus, again, preferably based in Wikipedia guidelines(one of which has already been mentioned). I've responded to and took action on the edit warring complaint only. If you want the partial block removed, please follow the instructions. 331dot (talk) 10:30, 6 December 2021 (UTC)