User talk:49.184.56.196

October 2021
Your recent editing history at Helicopter carrier shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 05:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Helicopter carrier. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. '' Note: Please consider this another warning to discontinue edit warring, and also, I encourage you to go to the article talk page and discuss your edits. Thank you -  wolf '' 07:56, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello. Your recent edit to Wolf (name) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline.   --Ferien (talk) 08:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass other editors, as you did at Wolf (name).   Tommi1986 let's talk! 09:36, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Go look at yourself before you harrass people

49.184.56.196 (talk) 09:56, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -  wolf  08:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * That is fine. I have removed additional material from the article now. Especially after someone else removed the Argus example from another section.49.184.56.196 (talk) 08:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * No, it's not "fine". You need to stop editing that article and start discussing it on the talk page. That is why it's there. No more edits should be made until there is a consensus on the talk page. Only then should the page be changed to the agreed upon version. Until then, either self-revert back to the last edit made, or just leave it alone altogether, and propose your edit with reasons and refs on the talk page. -  wolf  09:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * No, that piece of information does not belong there. That's why I removed it! So yes, it's going to be fine.49.184.56.196 (talk) 09:16, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * This isn't about the information that you feel is "fine", it's about the process, the policies and guidelines, and collaboration with other editors... all of which you are completely ignoring or willfully disregarding. The vandalized and harassment is just another step to far. -  wolf  09:36, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * It's not what I feel is fine. It's also what is fine. That is why Bilkat also wanted that bit removed. And I removed it.49.184.56.196 (talk) 09:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.