User talk:50.248.234.77

February 2018
Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Internet censorship in the United States— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 13:08, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

RE: Undo  What is your definition of "slow?"
I have generally heard the terms "slow" and "fast" in computer science jargon used to mean "polynomial time" and "not known to be polynomial time."

It is true, I suppose, that for a sufficiently large probability of error, very simple non-deterministic algorithms have fewer steps.

But as the numbers get large and the precision gets arbitrarily good, non-deterministic methods will take an infinite amount of time to match the finite time performance of a deterministic algorithm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1MathematicalGuy (talk • contribs) 02:18, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * A polynomial-time algorithm is a necessary condition for a fast algorithm, but not a sufficient one. Polynomial-time algorithms with large exponents, like AKS, are still too slow to be used much in practice. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 03:33, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to Dutch Reach. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (50.248.234.77) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! -KAP03 (Talk &#x2022;&#x20;Contributions &#x2022;&#x20;Email) 22:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

About Zawyeh art gallery
Hi 50.248.234.77 and thank you for bringing this to admin attention. Instead of outright deleting the article, I have WP:ROLLBACK-d the article to what would appear to me the version without the WP:COPYVIO-s, and then WP:REVDEL-d all the copyright infringements (which included your contributions, even though you weren't the person adding them). I would appreciate your opinion on whether this was an adequate response. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance. And also (I guess I'm obliged to say this), have you considered creating a username, etc? Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:28, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

New message from Emir of Wikipedia
Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 10:30, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Revert of my edit to Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination
Hi, I noticed you reverted my edit to Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination. Looking back, I agree that it is not "so-called", it is simply called that in general. In light of this, I think that most of my edit was reasonable, since the details of the court-packing plan are additional to the sentence and not the main focus, so do you think my edit would be "an improvement" if I remove the "so-called"? Thanks, ChromeGames923 (talk · contribs) 06:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, my only objection was to that specific phrase, which can be neutral, but can also be construed as casting doubt. I have no other objection to your prose edits. I would, however, prefer that changes to one article should be discussed on that one article's talk page. That's not an objection to this message, just a thought for the future. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 06:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the quick response, I see that using "so-called" was not optimal word choice when referring to the common name, as I did not intend for it to be interpreted as casting doubt on its validity. And thank you for your suggestion to discuss changes on the article's talk page instead, I will certainly keep that in mind in the future. Best, ChromeGames923 (talk · contribs) 06:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

COI guidelines?
I added a Request for Article for my employer Cerence (NASDAQ: CRNC) since after nearly a year nobody picked up the spinoff and added an entry. Since I work there, I cannot add a new Cerence entry for obvious COI reasons. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Business_and_economics/Companies/A-E#C

But -- can I add a one line REFERENCED blurb to the old parent company Nuance that we were spun off and divested to Cerence? I haven't had employment or a stake in Nuance for over a year. Would that still be COI?

Frazierjason (talk) 18:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't know anything about this, sorry. If there's a reason you're contacting me specifically, you'll need to say what that reason is. In general I suggest that you abide by the COI guidelines, however. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 18:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for responding. I saw your reverts on the Nuance page with comments that you were removing COI edits, so I figured you would be well-versed in COI and might have some advice about COI guidelines on company articles. This was my reason for contacting you. I'll continue seeking advice elsewhere. Frazierjason (talk) 19:32, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, that. Please be specific when you can. Yes, the Nuance Communications article was and is terrible, don't emulate it. You are already doing well by declaring that you do have a COI, unlike the company employees and investors who keep trying to edit that page. If you want advice for a new editor, I suggest asking a question at Teahouse, which is friendly to new and inexperienced editors. Otherwise, if you feel you have a tricky question that can't be answered there, you can post at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard, but I suggest starting at the Teahouse. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 20:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Done, thanks, and got a very useful reply. Teahouse Frazierjason (talk) 20:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm glad to see it. Thanks for being above board with your disclosure. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 21:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Page move discussion

 * See Talk:Nadella (surname). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Anno Domini—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 19:48, 16 August 2022 (UTC)