User talk:65HCA7

RFA
Hi, Apologies for removing part of your !vote - Obviously that was unintentional, I've had to remove the indents tho as your indents were causing my note to be counted as a !vote, That's one drawback to the RFA process the indents!, Anyway happy editing, – Davey 2010 Talk 22:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries; I understand completely. Those indents can be very frustrating sometimes!  Have a great rest of your night! :)  65  HC  A7  22:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . S warm  ♠  05:08, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a false alarm I apologize in advance, but I could not come up with any alternative explanation as to why a perfectly constructive vandal fighter in good standing would commit straightforward vandalism within an otherwise-acceptable reversion, as this account did here. This situation needs to be clarified, as it appears your account has been compromised by a vandal. S warm   ♠  05:16, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much; have a great rest of your day! 65 HC  A7  12:53, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * And thanks to for taking care of the unblock very quickly.  S warm   ♠  17:11, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Don't worry about it - stuff happens all the time, and many users I look up to around here have stuff in their block log too. Glad to see you got humour out of this incident. :D No hard feelings whatsoever. Cheers! 65 HC  A7  20:01, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

2 May 2018
Where exactly should I send a message 65HCA7? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BalancedViewoncancer (talk • contribs) 23:04, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I moved your comment to a new section at the bottom of the page per the talk page guidelines. Feel free to post any questions, comments, or concerns below this comment here or in a new section.


 * Cheers! 65  HC  A7  22:45, 3 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Edit to add (since I didn't see this before I made my original comment): the discussion on the neutral point of view noticeboard seems to sum up the appropriateness of your situation perfectly; other users were able to explain things in even more detail than I was, and as such I think we're done here. 65  HC  A7  22:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review for Kane Tanaka
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kane Tanaka. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 100.40.125.198 (talk) 12:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)