User talk:69.166.47.133

August 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Reggie Fils-Aime with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 02:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Peter Molyneux.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 02:51, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

December 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hooke's law, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Mild Bill Hiccup (talk) 05:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hooke's law with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   07:48, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 16:48, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Johnuniq. An edit that you recently made to Hooke's law seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Johnuniq (talk) 06:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chalk, you may be blocked from editing. Bahudhara (talk) 03:13, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Height— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Time 100. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Mild Bill Hiccup (talk) 04:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Rope with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  04:18, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Hooke's law, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Johnuniq (talk) 07:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Attack helicopter— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Scott the Woz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott the Woz, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Scott the Woz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)