User talk:73.24.160.43

April 2023
Hello, I'm Wesoree. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Brigitte Bardot seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --  Wesoree  ( talk · contribs ) 01:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I posted facts, not opinion. Why do you want to hide facts? 73.24.160.43 (talk) 01:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I updated it to be even more factually correct. Inciting Racial Hatred[edit]
 * Bardot has been convicted of "Inciting Racial Hatred” multiple times. Brigitte Bardot Is Handed Her Sixth Fine for “Inciting Racial Hatred” 73.24.160.43 (talk) 01:51, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * it's also a FACT, not opinion, that she is a Fascist, so I pout that back in, with citation!! 73.24.160.43 (talk) 02:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to Brigitte Bardot. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. --  Wesoree  ( talk · contribs ) 02:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I post a cit to REUTERS! REUTERS is fringe??? why are you supporting this racist so much? 73.24.160.43 (talk) 02:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I moved the racial hatred stuff to beta bottom, you can't complain it has "undue weight" when it's the last thing. My changes are all supported by facts with proper citations, stop playing games and leave up the facts. 73.24.160.43 (talk) 02:09, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * she has been convicted SIX TIMES!!! clearly this is not an insignificant part of her life. it's not fringe and noting it once - when she was convicted SIX TIMES - seems to be diminishing it's importance if anything rather than giving it undue weight. 73.24.160.43 (talk) 02:15, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brigitte Bardot. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 02:20, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Please explain how facts to wiki WITH CITATIONS is disruptive? 73.24.160.43 (talk) 02:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Please explain how facts to wiki WITH CITATIONS is disruptive? 73.24.160.43 (talk) 02:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Bardot has been convicted of inciting racial hatred multiple times. Brigitte Bardot is handed her sixth fine for “Inciting Racial Hatred” all facts with citations, what is the problem? 73.24.160.43 (talk) 02:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I added two sentences with citations. there is no conceivable way this violates any rule. 73.24.160.43 (talk) 02:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I have now added topic on article's talk page - why are you making this so difficult???? 73.24.160.43 (talk) 02:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC)