User talk:73.5.152.17

December 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * Information.svg I see that your first edit on Marias Pass had the edit summary "‎Climate: only one needed; latter seems more reliable". I think it's an unfortunate oversight that no further edits seem to acknowledge it.   signed, Willondon (talk)  17:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you, that is exactly what I was referring to. The administrator just above (and the page he linked to) sternly say that your block is because of your actions, not others' - as if it were possible to divorce the two - every edit conflict, however it happens, must have two sides. 73.5.152.17 (talk) 20:20, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * You can only control your own actions, that is why unblock requests should only discuss your actions. There are proper processes to use if you are being wronged by others or policies are being violated; fighting fire with fire is not acceptable. 331dot (talk) 20:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, I was one of the users that reverted you. Yes it was an oversight that I (and other editors) missed the edit summary. But for future reference, avoid uncivil comments like "rv idiot" and "your edit is vandalism". After all, we all make mistakes and Wikipedia is a community. Next time use the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle instead of edit warring. —  MATRIX! (a good person!)&#91;citation unneeded&#93; 21:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)


 * You've taken from my observation something I didn't intend. From my observation and my opinion, I did not express support that your block should be lifted, or that naming the section "Stupidity" should prove an effective tool for persuasion. It's true that the block is because of your behaviour, not anybody else's.  signed, Willondon (talk)  20:52, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I did not mean to attribute those exact sentiments to you, either, only observing that you saw my main point. There should be no need for an argument about that. 73.5.152.17 (talk) 21:19, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Boston—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 00:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeatedly attempting to perform disruptive actions may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)