User talk:80.194.119.171

October 2021
Hello, 80.194.119.171. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add requestedit to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

Graham 87 02:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Graham 87 14:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia editors are not employees, we are volunteers doing things here on our own time. You have not been "sentenced" as blocks are not a punishment, but a means to prevent disruption to the encyclopedia. No rudeness was intended, and I apologize, but we must be assured that the conduct will not repeat. As I said, please tell how you will comply with WP:COI specifically. I've already mentioned one aspect of this above. 331dot (talk) 12:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

My comment has reflected on a lack of professionalism and expertize in particular field. As I said, I will comply with WP:COI in a way that I will not perform self-citation or self-promotion with my edits, if there will be any in future.

Regarding the reply from 28.10 I have just seen - is this platform really consisted of jockers?! Is this a way to reply?! I have requested unblock and provided valid arguments. 80.194.119.171 (talk) 15:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * You only need one open request at a time, additional comments should be standard, unformatted comments like this one. Your request is open and pending. Administrators are volunteers who do what they can when they can, please be patient. 331dot (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2021 (UTC)