User talk:82.3.32.73

Attention: This IP address, , is registered to NTL and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact NTL to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. &mdash; Dan | Talk 21:01, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Stop changing the Dream Team Characters page back to reflect rubbish about harchester.tv. If you don't you will soon be blocked from wikipedia. Tim 09:24, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

Redirect of Baron Praxis
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Baron Praxis, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Baron Praxis is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Baron Praxis, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 07:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Uka Uka
I have nominated Uka Uka, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Uka Uka. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Collectonian (talk) 19:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

The Dust Collectors
Another editor has added the  template to the article The Dust Collectors, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Equal Vision Records
I have nominated Equal Vision Records, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Equal Vision Records. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ukexpat (talk) 01:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Death (cigarette) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death (cigarette) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Death (cigarette) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  — Keithbob • Talk  • 23:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC)