User talk:86.23.205.181

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Jackattack1597 (talk) 11:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Martin Heidegger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Phlsph7 (talk) 12:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Martin Heidegger, you may be blocked from editing. Phlsph7 (talk) 12:51, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Please don't characterise another editor's contribution as "more or less trash", as you did here. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Why? I endorsed the modified trash. Since opposed the trash and repeatedly removed the feedback to the trash, I smell a new savour, namely disruptive editing. Have words with that one about its deluded authority, eh? 86.23.205.181 (talk) 14:36, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I suggest you avoid personal attacks on other editors or you may be blocked. Regards. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Martin_Heidegger. Reason: Usage of offensive language to characterize other editors. Phlsph7 (talk) 18:11, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 20:58, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2021
Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, White1, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Cassiopeia  talk  07:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Zarathustra
You seem to be trying very hard to be insulting in that edit summary. There is no need for that, I was just editing according to how I saw it, but I will accept your version and quietly go off to a field somewhere to contemplate my stupidity. It seemed to me that the word 'refrain' already has the implication of repetition, and though not every discourse ends with the refrain, most of them do. I genuinely could not see how that quote added anything to the paragraph in the lead, but you no doubt do, so good luck to you. I appreciate your efforts on the article and quite enjoy your sense of humour. Harold the Sheep (talk) 22:34, 24 September 2021 (UTC)