User talk:93.164.22.202

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 93.164.22.202, has made edits to Take That that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:
 * Help contents – the main help page.
 * Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! KyleJoan talk 17:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Take That, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. KyleJoan talk 17:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Take That; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  KyleJoan talk 17:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

What’s your problem? You’re giving the article false information
 * Not according to multiple talk page discussions, which you can find here and here. Please observe WP:BRD and propose any changes you'd like to make under those discussions. KyleJoan talk 18:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

But then was not 2014?

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. KyleJoan talk 18:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you recently removed content from Music Played by Humans without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Ashley  yoursmile!  16:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Music Played by Humans shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Also applies to Elita (song) and Gary Barlow discography. If you cannot provide credible sources for those positions, please revert your own revision. CloseDatMouf (talk) 17:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Gary Barlow, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Elita (song)
Kindly stop editing Elita's page 1. There is no proof of Denmark charting 2. Singlechart is autocategorising entity. Stop manually adding the categories, especially those which do not even exist on the page (e.g. Germany) Kleool (talk) 14:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Gary Barlow discography. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.  T   CloseDatMouf  16:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring at Music Played by Humans and other articles
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. The filer asserts you have been falsifying chart positions. It is clear that you almost never communicate or use edit summaries to explain what you do. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Block evasion
This person is using multiple IPs from Denmark to evade their block. Involved IPs listed below. Binksternet (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I've blocked Special:Contributions/213.237.0.0/17 for two weeks for evasion. EdJohnston (talk) 03:06, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I'll keep an eye on this. Binksternet (talk) 04:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * After further disruption upon returning from the week-long block, Special:Contributions/213.237.0.0/17 got blocked for a month. Binksternet (talk) 00:59, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I've blocked Special:Contributions/213.237.0.0/17 for two weeks for evasion. EdJohnston (talk) 03:06, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I'll keep an eye on this. Binksternet (talk) 04:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * After further disruption upon returning from the week-long block, Special:Contributions/213.237.0.0/17 got blocked for a month. Binksternet (talk) 00:59, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * After further disruption upon returning from the week-long block, Special:Contributions/213.237.0.0/17 got blocked for a month. Binksternet (talk) 00:59, 19 April 2021 (UTC)