User talk:97.94.230.26

June 2023
Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Twink (gay slang) ‎. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, '''you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''' Wikipedialuva (talk) 03:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Canada Stop sign.svg 97.94.230.26 (talk) 04:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Twink (gay slang). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Yoshi24517  ( Chat ) ( Online ) 04:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * The consensus is just going to be that this form of racism is morally justifiable and socially acceptable, why would I waste my time doing that? Would you? 97.94.230.26 (talk) 04:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, yes I would use the talk page. It's how we get through disagreements.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Online ) 04:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * You mean how you manufacture consent to the prevailing neoliberal-progressive political ideology that grew out of frankfurt school critical theory and ecstatically does every single thing it claims to justify itself by fighting against? Because I'm well aware no matter how well I argue or how many philosophers I cite, this form of racism is seen as socially acceptable and morally justified. For now! 97.94.230.26 (talk) 04:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * You're welcome to find another reliable source that coincides with your thoughts.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Online ) 04:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * So I can just cite any political screed so long as it's in JSTOR or an equivalent right? Because that's what makes something reliable right? 97.94.230.26 (talk) 04:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Wikipedialuva (talk) 04:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Reply to comment on my talkpage
You left a message that states: "Why is this specific form of racism justified to you?" I never said any form of racism was justified, what I have done is requested that you stop edit warring and changing IPs to remove content that cites reliable sources without first obtaining consensus on the article's talkpage. The issue that I have is not that the content is being removed, but the way in which you are doing it. Wikipedialuva (talk) 05:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)


 * How else am I supposed to do it? I know this website is entirely controlled by leftist political extremists who think that sort of talk isn't racist at all and probably have wet dreams about declining white demographics. I'm only participating this much in the process because I'm genuinely interested to see just how far down the rot goes, because like if I can't even like twinks on pride month without being lectured by some horkheimer wannabe about how white people are evil in every single possible context that drives me insane on a theoretical level on how anyone can even hold such contradictory ideas. 97.94.230.26 (talk) 05:11, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as done at Twink (gay slang). During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. – Novem Linguae (talk) 05:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

July 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. DanCherek (talk) 04:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to White demographic decline appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mel ma nn  07:46, 25 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Why is there an article for every single other ethnic group or demographic that exists, as regards racism against them, but there is no article for racism against whites? I know why, you people blocked it, I have archives of the discussion that led to that on internet archive. 97.94.230.26 (talk) 07:49, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 * This entire website is just a propaganda platform unless it's an extremely technical STEM article and sometimes even then nowadays, I would delete this entire website if I could. 97.94.230.26 (talk) 07:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to White demographic decline. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Why is there an article for every single other kind of racism, except racism against white people? 97.94.230.26 (talk) 07:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at White demographic decline, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mel ma nn  07:55, 25 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Tell me why there is an article for every single other ethnic group experiencing racism but not white people 97.94.230.26 (talk) 07:58, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 * You zionists will not live much longer by the way 97.94.230.26 (talk) 07:58, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Also I'll just change my IP address with a VPN or similar, I hope you cry about it 97.94.230.26 (talk) 08:02, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 * You are apparently unaware of the contents of Category:Anti-white racism. Animal lover &#124;666&#124; 08:32, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I was unaware of that, sure, but why is it just a category, not a whole page? every single other group has a whole page, some of which could be condensed into novellas
 * Also, there was going to be a page for racism against white people, but its creation was blocked by political editors and admins on here basically saying that nobody needed it and it was a bad thing because it would make people think that white people experience racism (they do).
 * like this
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_against_Asians
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_against_African_Americans
 * white people are apparently not allowed to have that and also everyone should celebrate declining white demographic numbers until none exist anymore, it'll be better for the world (right? that seems to be how a lot of people think and it's worth your life to point it out basically) 97.94.230.26 (talk) 08:39, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 * they actually even deleted the internet archive upload I made to ensure I had evidence of that into the future (I wish I was just a schizo honestly hahaha)
 * https://web.archive.org/web/20230115081123/https://web.archive.org/web/20221110204458/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-white_racism 97.94.230.26 (talk) 08:55, 25 October 2023 (UTC)