User talk:ACMEDeputy

Has there been a consensus somewhere that the list of syndicated programs carried by a television station is limited to no more than five? Thank you. JTRH (talk) 00:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * A limit of four-five shows is fine so that it can not run afoul of WP:NOTTVGUIDE. It was reached two years ago. It must be a valid sourced. I wonder if TV Listings are valid sources? ACMEWikiNet (talk) 01:34, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I get the NOTTVGUIDE. I think it's generally trivia to list it at all, unless it has some relevance to the station's history or ratings position (like the number of stations whose 5 PM newscast led the market for more than 20 years because Oprah was their lead-in). I was just wondering how and when the number was agreed on. If it's listed on the station's Website, it's a reliable source. JTRH (talk) 01:37, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm Lovkal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from KABC-TV without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. lovkal (talk) 12:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC) Disregard warning. lovkal (talk) 08:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

You need to back away from the situation
While you reverted this, the fact that you posted it, along with the incoherence of your message on my talk page, indicates that you are too emotionally compromised to properly handle this matter. You are not seeing the other user as a new user who needs their mistakes explained to them, you are out for blood.

If I went after you the same way you treated him (combined with the experience I have here), you'd probably be blocked by now or at least given an IBAN. That's not a threat, that's just a comparison.

If Gatorsfan25 is seriously a problem, you're not going to be the only user to report him.

When you have a problem with a user, remember that they are human and they might not know what you're doing (just like you really don't know what you're doing at WP:ANI or WP:SPI). When you make accusations, you need to start from the perspective that you might be completely wrong and compile evidence so that someone who is completely unfamiliar with the case but assumes that you are wrong will have to agree. Presenting no diffs, as you originally did at ANI, is (at best) a waste of everyone's time. At worst, it is a common tactic used by trolls against users in good standing. Presenting a list of diffs with no context, as you did at ANI and SPI, comes off as telling others "do my work for me" (unless you're assuming we're telepathic).

I'm certain that you can do better -- later. Right now, you need to find something else (whether it's something else on this site or something off of this site).

Ian.thomson (talk) 02:04, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Fox NFL a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. I have reverted your edits please discuss on the talk page. You need a source about your "legally still called" claims. oknazevad (talk) 21:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AFHV Main Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:AFHV Main Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Cash Explosion, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Do not add unsourced content to articles. You have been blocked multiple times for edit warring and sock puppetry. Please stop your disruptive editing. '' AldezD (talk) 13:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Cash Explosion, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please stop disruptive editing. Wikipedia is not a forum and as an editor with a long history you are aware of WP:V and WP:CS.'' AldezD (talk) 12:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:AldezD, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ,  AldezD (talk) 13:10, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at WP:RPP, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 02:23, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at KABC-TV. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Zapera  (Talk/Contributions) 11:37, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
It said on Adweek.com that NBC Sports will debut a new graphics package for the super bowl. It is a Little more than 2 Weeks to Super Bowl LII. And it is not Crystalballish. 68.102.39.189 (talk) 14:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Unblock Request
See Sockpuppet investigations/ACMEDeputy/Archive. --Yamla (talk) 17:14, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * @User:Yamla: Appears to me that compared to my edits to Csworldwide2 and this troublemaker TheCopyrightMachine, my edits are good faith. I stopped edit TV station years ago and edited articles on a sheldom basis. So, I did not made those accounts. I am not a sockpuppet master of Csworldwide2 nor TheCopyrightMachine. Like I said they are two completly different users. I apologize to whoever who blocked me and I continue to make good edits. I would continue to make good faith articles. ACMEDeputy (talk) 17:25, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * A checkuser found that the technical data for your account matched the technical data for Csworldwide2 and TheCopyrightMachine. There will be even more to compare it with once a CU checks out .  It's also a pretty big coincidence that someone who has engaged in sockpuppetry before just happens to have a neighbor who edits in a similar manner. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:35, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Could you elaborate on the edits made by TheCopyrightMachine? Please, be expansive.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 18:45, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Did you mean me or ACMEDeputy? Ian.thomson (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, no. ACMEDeputy. I'd like to hear more about it.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 18:48, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * This particular edit that TheCopyrightMachine did was really offensive to a Wikipedia user or a moderator. He not only swore at Rusf10, he copied and pasted the information that was from the student manual of Indiana University of Pennsylvania's TV Manual. That is a huge "no-no" when making a Wikipedia article. That constitutes copyright infringement and we can all get sued for copyright. I don't usually create new articles. I always check for reliable sources when adding something to the article. Just like when you are in school doing an essay, if you copy and paste an essay word for word from an owner's manual it's a big plagiarism.

In addition to this edit he also added AT&T SportsNet Pittsburgh. Most cable systems in the markets outside of Pittsburgh (such as Johnstown-Altoona, Harrisburg, or Erie) carry AT&T SportsNet Pittsburgh. Can this be included in the television market templates of Johnstown-Altoona, Steubenville-Wheeling, Youngstown, and Hagerstown despite they are near the Pittsburgh market?

Earlier today, he attempted to hack into my account using the "Password Forget" feature. I was going "Is he gonna hack into my account?" This is after I got the e-mail stating my account is blocked from editing.

Meanwhile, Csworldwide2 impersonated User:Csworldwide1. Csworldwide2's edits follow the same behavior pattern as Csworldwide1. Thank you very much for blocking, Csworldwide2. 20:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)


 * After reading the bottom of the sock-puppet report, Page moved. Sir Sputnik stated that "Behavioural evaluation leads me to a similar conclusion as the CU evidence. A connection is possible, but unlikely." I do not have a distinct connection with Csworldwide2. ACMEDeputy (talk) 20:37, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Now that Csworldwide1 is unblocked, I disagree on I didn’t create Csworldwide2. It must be a anonymous user. I better off resting off editing WP over the summer until this appeal/case blows over. I was blocked thrice for edit warring. I need a break on editing articles.  I never want to create articles nor create puppet accounts. I prefer to have my block downgraded to three months. ACMEDeputy (talk) 10:30, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * You are misstating what was found. The full quote is, "As for TMK1989, behavioural evaluation leads me to a similar conclusion as the CU evidence. A connection is possible, but unlikely." That's only for TMK1989 (compared to you). There's no doubt with the other three accounts, ACMEDeputy and Csworldwide2 and TheCopyrightMachine. No doubt. --Yamla (talk) 13:28, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ACMEDeputy is acutally a sockpuppet account itself, the master is Gsnguy. see Sockpuppet investigations/Gsnguy Rusf10 (talk) 01:35, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Who the heck is Gsnguy? A Trump supporter? That user is a long gone user who went on a spree of incorrect slogans, slipping profanities on talk pages. That person’s editing behavior is a big s.o.b. He’s been listening to too much of that singer who sang Sweet Home Alabama All Summer Long. ACMEDeputy (talk) 10:45, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

No reason for you to have talk page access as you aren't eligible for unblock consideration here. Talk page access revoked to prevent you wasting yet more of our time. --Yamla (talk) 11:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WJAC2016logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:WJAC2016logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 30 November 2021 (UTC)