User talk:Adelphious

Continuing our discussion
Hi Adelphious. I repeatedly asked you for more examples of the problems you see. You haven't given any. I just want to indicate at this point that I'd still like to see such examples. Alternatively, examples of others addressing similar situations in a manner that you find to be commendable.

I appreciate your dialing back your characterization of the "temperature" of the dispute.

I am a bit concerned that you may be putting aside the requirements that BLP puts on editors, but then you're not really focusing on the content. I find it best to focus on content, and wish there were stronger general consensus for editors to do so.

When addressing editors behavior, I think it be to keep WP:BATTLE, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, and WP:AGF in mind at all times. It's easy to stir up situations, difficult to deescalate them.

As I said, "I'm not here for popcorn." If there are behavioral problems that need to be discussed, clarity and deescalation are my goals. What are yours? --Ronz (talk) 15:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Reviewing my posts on your talk page I see that I gave two specific examples of problems, that I repeated the second example twice, and that I drew attention to a third perceived tendency, in each case referring to the specific Wikipedia policy or guideline contravened. I'm in earnest and haven't minced words, but it's totally reasonable for you to ask that I clarify them. Let's continue on your talk page, where we started. Adelphious (talk) 19:31, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I think we're done. Whatever your goals may be, I'm not finding this discussion helpful. It's easy to stir up situations, difficult to deescalate them. --Ronz (talk) 21:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

General sanctions alert
Retimuko (talk) 20:44, 22 January 2019 (UTC)