User talk:Ado2102

Water resources law
Ado, I read your comments originally at Talk:Water law and not at Talk:Water resources law and I'm making this my current project. But I sure could use some help. I already renamed the page as you suggested, I removed off-topic paragraphs about engineering from the history section, and added some about international law and the right to water. I was hoping to get your guidance on how to proceed with cleaning this up. You can respond here or at Talk:Water resources law. Thanks for the help, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:47, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Investment
Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 00:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:No Quiero Na' Regala'o/GA1
Ado2102, you opened the review page back on July 30, but have yet to begin the actual review. Since it's been over a month since it was opened, and over three weeks since you last edited Wikipedia, this is beginning to look like an abandoned review. If you are no longer interested in reviewing it, please let me know. If you haven't begun the review in seven days, the review will be considered abandoned, and the page subject to deletion. I hope you are well. Thank you for your interest in GAN. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

What you can do for the WikiJournal of the Humanities
Hi Adam!

I'm the editor-in-chief of the WikiJournal of the Humanities. Given your experience with Wikipedia and understanding of academia, I'm emailing to ask whether you might be interested in getting involved as an editor for the WikiJournal of Humanities. It's modelled on the successful Wikipedia-integrated journals, the WikiJournal of Medicine, and the WikiJournal of Science. Our editorial board covers a range of fields and expertise, aiming to cover disciplines across the humanities, arts, and social sciences. Our approach combines the rigour of academic peer review with the extensive reach of an encyclopedia. Consequently, it is an excellent way to achieve public engagement and outreach while impacting public understanding of complex scholarly topics. Articles undergo peer review and are subsequently published in both standard academic PDF format and directly onto Wikipedia, often getting over 100,000 views annually. This enhances the encyclopedia's scientific and factual accuracy and offers academics citable, indexed publications. Moreover, it enables significantly broader dissemination compared to traditional scholarly publishing methods. The time commitment is flexible. An editor would generally dedicate 2-10 hours per month to a range of activities. Please let me know if this aligns with your interests, or if you'd like to know more. Your experience and expertise would be highly appreciated. Fransplace... Let's talk 23:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)