User talk:Aecwriter
Moved tilde discussion to talk page[edit]
I think you're on the right track. Wikipedia could use more editors like you. I noticed that you've recently signed your posts three times by either manually typing or cut & pasting your signature (e.g., "AECwriter 09:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC)", causing the automated User:SineBot to "clean up" after you by re-signing your comment with "— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aecwriter (talk • contribs) ". Since this has been pointed out three times on your talk page (User talk:Aecwriter) and you have yet to edit your talk page, I'm mentioning it here, in case you have not yet noticed your talk page. Signing my comment by typing four consecutive tildes (click the show preview button to see what that looks like before you click save page), Wbm1058 (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks very much. Question: If I used four tildes to make my post, and then went in later and bolded some sentences, would the signature revert to "unsigned"? I might have made a user error, but could swear I used the tildes. AECwriter 16:24, 16 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aecwriter (talk • contribs)
- You did type four tildes this time, in your edit summary comment: [1]. You can look at that any time by clicking on View history in the upper right of your browser window. However, the tildes should be typed at the end of your message rather than in the edit summary. If you are doing that, then you may have found an error in how the wiki software handles your browser configuration. You can go back and make minor edits to your previous comments without effecting the original signature. If you make substantial revisions, it's a good idea to sign the comments a second time, or I've seen some update the date & time of the original signature. Wbm1058 (talk) 18:30, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- testing 1–2–3 Wbm1058 19:57, 16 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wbm1058 (talk • contribs) I duplicated the behavior of your SineBot-assisted signatures by typing my username Wbm1058 followed by five tildes. The standard procedure is to not type in your username and use just 4, not 5 tildes. See Wikipedia:Signatures for further information. --Wbm1058 (talk) 20:10, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks very much. Question: If I used four tildes to make my post, and then went in later and bolded some sentences, would the signature revert to "unsigned"? I might have made a user error, but could swear I used the tildes. AECwriter 16:24, 16 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aecwriter (talk • contribs)
About[edit]
I am a professional editor of marketing materials and live in Oakland, California. I have a background in journalism and contributed partial revisions to three Wikipedia articles. I am a reluctant crowdsourcer. User:AecwriterAECwriter 20:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
and now for something completely different....[edit]
http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/05/the-trouble-with-too-much-democracy/
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Aecwriter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your signature[edit]
Hello, Aecwriter. While responding to your message at Talk:Haymarket affair, I noticed that your signature doesn't comply with WP:Signatures. In particular, an editor's signature should include a link to the user's page, talk page, or contributions per WP:SIGLINK, and your signature doesn't have any links.
Please add a link to your talk page or contributions to your signature. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:49, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
I am sure I used four tildes, and it's my understanding that's all that's required. AECwriter 19:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Aecwriter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Aecwriter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Aecwriter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Important Notice[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 20:29, 15 November 2021 (UTC)