User talk:Ahmadac

Rastan & Talbiseh
About your revert on the Syrian civil war map, and your allegation of RT not being a reliable source, do you have any proof or consensus about that (as RT is used as a reliable source in dozens if not hundreds of WP articles), or thats simply your personal opinion and the rest of users have to accept it?.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Nawa
See footnote #8: "The towns which have received the brunt of regime attacks are al-Sheikh Maksin, Tafas, Nawa, and Dael." . Regime attacks=contested at the very least. See also. I recommend you self-revert. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 08:46, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Unspecified source for File:Damsacus infobox2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Damsacus infobox2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:57, 14 April 2014 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ibrahim.ID »» 21:57, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

re: about file
The file moved to commons, I'm not administrator in Commons and I can't restore this file, you can add request here Undeletion requests and put the source of every pictures you had used on it -- Ibrahim.ID »» 18:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Enoki WendyIbuki.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Enoki WendyIbuki.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:11, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Calm Wendy Ibuki.jpg


The file File:Calm Wendy Ibuki.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Uploaded to support Wendy Ibuki, A7'd in 2009. Also dubious claim that it's free use since the author isn't the artist."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 15:02, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Jim Pescott for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Pescott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jim Pescott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 07:16, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Damascus Metro.jpg


The file File:Damascus Metro.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Witch of Portobello.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Witch of Portobello.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 29 April 2021 (UTC)