User talk:Akb4

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! RJFJR 13:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Renaming Family_name article
Hello, Akb4,

I see that you have edited the Family_name article and had some thoughts about organizing it better. Could you weigh in on my idea of changing the article name? Thank you. --DBlomgren 01:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Wow! I found a detail-oriented editor when I wrote you. After your input on the above, I realize it needs putting several heads together and planning a better outline/redistribution of articles. Before I get involved in this, I want to finish rewriting the Hawthorne effect. After that I'll help reorganize if you or Frappyjohn or others have not already taken the initiative. DBlomgren 03:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

abbeys
I don't see the abbey article saying that.

It makes references to mendicants, who do not have abbots, but priors (or "ministers" and "guardians" in the Franciscan tradition). I don't know why somebody included long sections on specifications about religious houses, which don't belong in the abbey article.HarvardOxon 21:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

An abbey is a canonically erected house of consecrated religious under solemn vows following a monastic way of life. It is headed by an abbot or abbess. ALL abbesses head monasteries of nuns. All abbots head monasteries of men -- monks, except in the case of "canons regular" who are a peculiar type of religious, only some of whom have "abbots."

Hence, all those answerable to an abbess are nuns, but not all nuns answer to an abbess.

A monastery may be an abbey, or a priory, or a hermitage conceivably. In common, non-technical parlance, monastery is also used to refer to convents and friaries.

These are technical terms, and you shouldn't be altering these articles without having a fair understanding of canon law and religious orders. FRoim what you say, I think you are largely misreading what is said in these admittedly somewhat sloppy articles.HarvardOxon 21:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Male religious: monks canons regular mendicant friars clerks regular later orders of religious brothers

Female religious: female monks -- nuns female canons regular -- nuns female mendicants/2nd orders -- nuns the above are headed by an abbess (abbey)or a prioress (priory)

third orders regular -- religious sisters later orders of sisters -- religious sisters the above are headed by various "superiors" -- "mother superior," "sister president" etc.HarvardOxon 21:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

All abbeys are monasteries, not all monasteries are abbeys. "Convent" means a place to come together, a gathering, a house of religious. Thus, i suppose, all monasteries are convents, but not all convents are monasteries. In normal, but techincal, English, we use convent in several ways: to indicate a non-monastic house of men or women (a "convent of Dominican friars," for instance); to indicate a house of women religious sisters (a convent attached to a school); to indicate a house of women religious of any type, including a monastery ("Maria is entering the convent and taking the veil as a nun").

However, an abbess can only exist for a canonically erected abbey of women, which means a monastery with women taking monastic vows, autonomous and sufficiently stable to be recognized as an abbey.

The articles are riddled with inaccuracies.

For instance, priory: a priory may mean a satellite or "daughter" monastery of an abbey, dependent on the abbot who appoints a prior to run that local house; a priory may mean a newly founded monastery which has not yet established itself with sufficient stability and size to be canonically erected as an abbey; a priory may be a monastery in an order which has no abbeys at all but only priories (Carthusians, e.g.); a priory may be a house of a mendicant order (Dominican houses are priories); a priory may be a region (Dominicans have provincial priors). There are also claustral priors, within an abbey, who are deputies of the abbot.HarvardOxon 22:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Munthe
Im from the spanish edition of the wikipedia. I have found in Commons a frre photo of axel Munte thumb|310px|Axel Munthe. You can see it in the spanish page of Axel Munthe http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axel_Munthe#Biograf.C3.ADa


 * gracias! I've copied it over. -- Akb4 03:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Michael Masley
Nice job on Michael Masley! It makes me feel good to see articles like that flourish. While I'm sure many would throw the article up for VfD as 'Non-Notable', it's just these kind of articles that set Wikipedia apart in my mind. I mean, where else could you find this information? So again, good show! --Falcorian (talk) 18:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Eighth-generation video game console
Please don't move my page; When you redirect it to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_video_game_consoles_%28eighth_generation%29 it gets deleted and protected. my page is accurate thus far.

License tagging for Image:Catchlights-example-Pablo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Catchlights-example-Pablo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:06, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Butt harp, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. VivioFa teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 18:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Ignore previous notice, speedy removed. VivioFa  teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 19:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Detachable Penis
Not quite sure what you mean -- I didn't remove any lyrics from the article; if anything, I added more, just moving them into a "double entendres" segment. Of course, it might count as Original Research, but I'm hoping enough people would agree that it's "obvious" rather than expect me to cite it! Dave-ros (talk) 00:20, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Luchow's
Hi Akb4.. I was pleasantly surprised to see you added a wiki page for Luchow's the great and now defunct German restaurant in New York City. Can I ask where you got the inspiration to write about it? Did you go to the restaurant? I did when I was a child and have dreamlike memories of its cavernous interior. My wiki name is: bmcclean1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmcclean1 (talk • contribs) 18:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC) Thanks for your response about Luchow's. I am new to adding and editing photos on wiki and I am not sure what to do regarding the Luchow's image I uploaded. I am not sure if it is copyrighted or not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmcclean1 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Minor edits and "@! Party" article
Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.'

I see you mark most of your edits as minor edits. For example, you marked your comments on my talk page as a "minor edit", but that is not a minor edit.

Also, I just wanted to let you know I had responded to your question on my talk page in case you didn't see it yet. -- Hi  Ev  03:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Netrek question
Hi. I saw that you edited Netrek. I have a few questions on this which are not covered in article:

(If it's not too much trouble, and if you reply, could you please post your reply at my talk page?) thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 18:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * How does a player actually begin playing this? Do they download software? Is there a fee?
 * What is the manner of gameplay? are there multiple deaths and kills during gameplay? How do players regenerate?

@! Party
Another editor has added the " " template to the article @! Party, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Catchlights-example-Pablo.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Catchlights-example-Pablo.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Sherool (talk) 12:21, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Detachable Penis has been restored
I have undeleted Detachable Penis at your request; however, the article needs work if it is not to be deleted again. Regards, BencherliteTalk 10:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. I have left a message for the editor who left the PROD in the first place as s/he will be better able to judge whether there are still issues with the article as it stands.  Regards, BencherliteTalk 08:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Mention in Ars Technica article: "On Wikipedia’s 15th birthday, Ars shares the entries that most fascinate us"David Woodward ☮ ♡♢☞☽ 08:22, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Butt harp
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Butt harp, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Butt harp. Listing Port (talk) 16:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Butt harp
An editor has nominated Butt harp, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Netrek
Thanks for asking... the article has a number of issues. But if I could point to a few things, it would be (1) the lead is too long and the list should be converted into prose, (2) the basics section is too long and needs to be developed into a summary, with better organization, and (3) the ship types go into too much detail for an encyclopedia. But more important than any of those, the article needs proper references. This is so people can verify the information in the article, and so people can see if the game is notable enough to qualify for wikipedia. This is just my opinion, but I think it's close to what I've seen from how other articles have been handled. Feel free to ask me any further questions. Randomran (talk) 23:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pepperpot (Monty Python)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Pepperpot (Monty Python). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Pepperpot (Monty Python). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:46, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PLATO Moria character creation menu .png
 Thanks for uploading File:PLATO Moria character creation menu .png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:34, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PLATO Moria main game screen .png
 Thanks for uploading File:PLATO Moria main game screen .png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:35, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Johnny Parker (jazz trumpeter)


The article Johnny Parker (jazz trumpeter) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Only source is an NME gig listing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (Help!) 16:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Galactic Attack, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PLATO and Moria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

The notice of the deletion of the article Demonstrator model
Here is the notice of the deletion of the article Demonstrator model, which was created by you. Please see Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 21 for the reason of the deletion request, thank you. — 卍・〇・卐 03:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Maggie Schpak moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Maggie Schpak, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  DGG ( talk ) 00:37, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Maggie Schpak concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Maggie Schpak, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Maggie Schpak


Hello, Akb4. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maggie Schpak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shep Shepherd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social Security. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 31 May 2021 (UTC)