User talk:Aksnitd

Big Bad Moon
A template has been added to the article Big Bad Moon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Phgao 06:24, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Stunt
No, this page isn't a copyright violation. The website allexperts.com copies content from Wikipedia (which they are entitled to under the terms of the GFDL license), not vice versa; they even acknowledge so much at the bottom of the page. Regards, Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:38, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to The Matrix does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. ''I almost reverted your change to The Matrix as factual error vandalism, largely because you did not give an edit summary. The only reason it didn't get reverted is because I happened to spot the full name of the person at the very last moment (just as I was about to click the instant revert button) and realised that you were actually making a good faith change per the MOS. Please always give a good edit summary, and never leave it blank (even if you think your change is obvious), as it causes confusion and makes your changes much more likely to get reverted.'' Murph 9000  (talk) 17:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)