User talk:AleXd

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Djegan (talk) 00:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your edits to Blackrock College
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Keith D (talk) 11:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

I didn't make those vandal edits and don't know how I was attributed. See my history for past examples of constructive editing to this page. AleXd 14:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Brian Cowen
When encountering profanity on Wikipedia, please keep in mind that the encyclopedia is not censored. In this particular instance, the expletive appears in a properly sourced quote and its inclusion is not inappropriate. Dppowell (talk) 14:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

It's not appropriate though.AleXd (talk) 20:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

October 2008
In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Jammy (talk) 19:40, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Harry Potter is a a British article, all the Harry Potter pages are written in British English.AleXd (talk) 19:44, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * And yet you change it to American English. Jammy (talk) 19:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

No, I replaced the "Z" with "S", American to [|English].AleXd (talk) 19:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Well whatever you may believe, the correct British spelling is "idealized" and "romanticized". Which I checked in a dictionary written by a professor from the University of Manchester. Jammy (talk) 19:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Celtic Tiger
Please note that on wikipedia we do not remove material because its the "opinion of a left wing commentator". By all means supply references supportive of your hero, but no censorship based on the side of the political spectrum someone is from. Djegan (talk) 21:45, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

The point was that the encyclopedia based a major substantive and controversial claim in the lead of an important article. That Charlie McCreevy was the worst Minister for Finance ever, shouldn't even have been in the section. I pointed out he was a left wing journalist - not an expert on the topic - who opposed McCreevy's policies for ideological reasons. That's fine, but shouldn;t be taken as fact so promiently.AleXd (talk) 20:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi
Hi! I hope the discussion on the talk page of Taleb can move forward in a nice and calm manner. If the discussion do not improve, we should follow the advice in [] & []. Hopefully that process can give a calm discussion avoiding WP:PA. Ulner (talk) 19:21, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I just saw I have broken this advice myself: Do not respond on a talk page of an article... :) Ulner (talk) 19:23, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Ulner, I think intelligence and good sense will win through in the end. I was about to post something similar on your page. Keep up the good work! --AleXd (talk) 21:21, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Political views of Christopher Hitchens


The article Political views of Christopher Hitchens has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Excessively detailed, redundant with Christopher Hitchens, and full of original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dr. Fleischman (talk) 16:40, 22 July 2016 (UTC)