User talk:Alexanderovechkinfan

Welcome!

 * }

GAN reviews
Hi, I am a little concerned about your reviews of Talk:Sami Salo/GA1 (about 2 minutes, then passed); Talk:Donald Brashear/GA1 (4 minutes, then passed); Talk:Bill Quackenbush/GA1 (a day, then on hold, but nominator not informed. I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from reviewing good article nominations, but your reviews seem a little superficial to say the least.  The most recent doesn't point out where you found it deficient.  Please read the good article criteria. The template {{subst:FGAN}} may help you organize the critique. You can also use {{subst:GAList}} or {{subst:GAList2}} to generate a checklist.  You may also benefit from reading Reviewing good articles. Cheers. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Reviews
Thanks for the recent reviews of a couple of my GAN. I appreciate it, I was expecting a much longer wait. Cheers --Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 02:24, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)