User talk:Alexlamf

Re:
Hi Alexlamf. First off, thanks for contacting me. Wikipedia, im not sure if you have read yet, does not allow people do add their point of view because it is considered Original research. Also, any user can delete (or tag something with ) if it has no source. All contributions, when adding controversial information, should include reliable sources. Ok, getting that out of the way.

Ill follow up a response on the talk page of the article. -- LaNicoya  •Talk•   02:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi again. I think you misunderstood. I at no moment said your contributions were POV, but they are OR if they have no source. But again, the reason why i hid it is because its better suited in its own page, which it now has. As for the textbook, you should be aware that both published and online (reliable) sources are accepted here on wikipedia. As for the lack of some online sources for many subject, i don't know what to tell you.. It frustrates me too at times because then there is a lack of information for the sole fact that no source is existent, but those are wikipedia rules.

''Other facts like the majority of Asians are Southeast Chinese, is proven by the fact that I live in Panama since childhood and most of my acquaintances are of that heritage. (Biased? I belong to both Chinese social groups; Mainland and Taiwan, and participate actively in this community)'' This is not considered biased, but is considered original research.--  LaNicoya  •Talk•   05:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 03:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Star Trek 11 (Movie)
For a start the source was a blog. Rehevkor ✉  02:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * My thoughts would be to take it to the article's talk page and gain a consensus. Rehevkor ✉  16:02, 25 May 2009 (UTC)