User talk:Aleyamma38

Fan-based editing
Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia, not a fan website. Content must be written in a neutral tone, and not with the motive of lavishing praise on the article subjects. Therefore, it is wholly inappropriate to commentary like "Though, being a supporting cast she is loved by all for her acting skills" which you did at both Aparna Mishra and Draft:Zeeshan Khan (actor). Your opinions do not belong in articles. We only care what reliable published sources have to say about any given subject.

Further, edit summaries are intended to be used to explain to other editors why you made the changes you did. Comments like "advanced b'day_wishing a successful 26th 2021 ahead" are not what the edit summary field is for. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:09, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, and one other thing, re: File:Aparna Mishra KKB Actress.jpg, you can't take content from sources like the subject's Instagram, then claim that they are in the Creative Commons. That's intellectual property theft and it will not be tolerated. Don't do it again. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * My extreme apologies for these errors. I will change them and never commit them again. Sorry once again--Aleyamma38 (talk) 19:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm Beccaynr. I noticed that you recently removed content from Debattama Saha without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please discuss on the Talk page of the article. Beccaynr (talk) 05:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Beccaynr, I did not remove the content by mistake. I had removed it because that content accounts for WP:PUFFERY. Please remember Beccaynr that Wikipedia is NOT A PLATFORM FOR FAN-BASED EDITING. You have contributed and improved the article Debattama Saha, I really appreciate that but Wikipedia articles are supposed to have NEUTRAL TONES not WP:PUFFERY.
 * Plus, I removed the source of PINKVILLA because it is an unrealiable source. Please check WP:RELIABLE for more guidance. Best--Aleyamma38 (talk) 05:24, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * From my view, nothing in the article fit the description of WP:PUFFERY, so I request that you specifically identify which language seems like puffery so we can discuss it before it is deleted. And Pinkvilla appears to be a review, republished by MSN, so I also disagree with your removal of that source. Per WP:BRD, I have asked you to discuss these issues on the Talk page of the article, and I continue to ask that you discuss these issues on the Talk page instead of repeatedly making reversions. Your revisions also appear to have removed content from the lead based on reliable sources that support notability, in an article you have nominated for deletion, so I request that you restore that information as well. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 05:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * See, everyone has their viewpoints. Why is there even a need to double rewrite something in both CAREER and TELEVISION section and that accounts for WP:PUFFERY. And don't worry I have only removed PINKVILLA none of the other RELAIABE SOURCES to support the notability of the subject. Please check WP:RELIABLE which clearly indicates Pinkvilla to be a UNRELIABLE SOURCE. I really appreciate your nerve to save the article. Please do it without involving FAN BASED EDITING and ADDING UNRELIABLE SOURCES. Best--Aleyamma38 (talk) 05:49, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Your revisions also appear to have removed content from the lead based on reliable sources that support notability, Please note except for Pinkvilla, the other source which has been part of career section has been shifted to television section. So, it is still present in the article. Best--Aleyamma38 (talk) 05:53, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Pinkvilla appears to be a legitimate entertainment website, so it seems usable as a review. There also was no rewritten content - it was additional prose written in a neutral style based on information from a reliable source, so it was not puffery. In addition, the content I added to the lead that you removed was based on information from reliable sources that described a significant role in a notable television show, so I disagree with the removal. I continue to request that you reconsider your deletions based on my explanation. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 06:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * My apologies, but your EXPLANATIONS are not VALID, whatever it is PINKVILLA is an UNRELIABLE SOURCE in Wikipedia. Please note, it was one of the admins Cyphoidbomb who had stated about WP:PUFFERY by removing additional details in Career section which is meant for the present roles and very important roles (such as debut or breakthrough roles). So, I would not reconsider my deletions. Please do improve the article more with the help of RELAIBLE SOURCES AND NOT INVOLVING FAN-BASED EDITING. Thanks--Aleyamma38 (talk) 06:17, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello again, I noticed on your Talk page that there is a section titled Fan-based editing, and maybe could help clarify the issue on the article Talk page, now that this is being discussed there? Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 23:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, I think you should look into and understand the section titled Fan-based editing more, so that you realize, WHY ACTUALLY I REMOVED THE CONTENT from Debattama Saha, Best--Aleyamma38 (talk) 03:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Just to inform you ONE SMALL THING, I'm not going to edit Wikipedia anymore from now onwards so you can continue with editing of Debattama Saha in the way you want. I won't be there to object anything. Goodluck--Aleyamma38 (talk) 04:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for a generally combative attitude that makes harmonious editing difficult, and bludgeoning discussions with lots of ACCUSATIONS BOLDED WITH CAPS LOCK. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:55, 22 April 2021 (UTC) This is the result of a community discussion, now recorded at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1064, therefore a community discussion would be required before unblocking. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)